 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-08-2010, 09:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Given that you bought this card, it could have been graded a while ago, and calling SGC doesn't sound promising, as they won't remember the card. You could resubmit it to them, either raw or as is, some folks have recieved bumps, but I think mostly SGC has a rigid set of grading standards that lead to strange results like this.
Your other option would be to submit it raw to PSA. I would only go through any of this hassle if you were thinking of selling the card, after all, it will be the same card no matter what the label on the slab says... 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Reprising the recent Red Cobb survey....with new info | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 09-26-2009 11:14 AM |
| Red Cobb survey....re:.PIEDMONT 460/42 enigma ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-26-2009 08:23 PM |
| Relative rarity of Cobb SOV 460 to BL 460, DRUM, LENOX, UZIT ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 79 | 05-23-2009 12:39 PM |
| Cobb vs. Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 90 | 07-03-2005 10:50 AM |
| Cobb vs. Ruth | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 07-09-2004 05:06 PM |
Threaded Mode