 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-04-2010, 08:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Now that I've wiped the drool from my face -
I prefer the ink to be consistent with the era. I owned 2 1966 Topps Curt Ford PSA/DNA cards at the same time. I sold the Sharpie and kept the ink for that very reason. It just looked more vintage. (Curt Flood sigs below, these all passed PSA/DNA) Ball point pen on modern card (especially the glossy ones from the 90's and 2000's) really look bad in my opinion. The ink just doesn't take to them very well, therefore, Sharpie is the only way to go. (2001 Topps Traded Pujols Sharpie pic below)  
Last edited by frankhardy; 06-04-2010 at 08:14 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Bad card sold by 4_sharp_corners | HBroll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-18-2009 04:28 PM |
| T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
| The Mick,. The Prez and The Captain All On One Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-06-2007 05:28 PM |
| A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 11:36 AM |
| I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |
Threaded Mode