 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What percent do you think the center panel is Joe Jackson? | |||
| 0% |
   
|
7 | 4.00% |
| 1%-10% |
  
|
2 | 1.14% |
| 11%-20% |
  
|
7 | 4.00% |
| 21%-40% |
  
|
7 | 4.00% |
| 41%-50% |
  
|
9 | 5.14% |
| 51%-60% |
  
|
12 | 6.86% |
| 61%-80% |
|
16 | 9.14% |
| 81%-90% |
|
25 | 14.29% |
| 91%-99% |
|
54 | 30.86% |
| 100% |
|
36 | 20.57% |
| Voters: 175. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
05-26-2010, 05:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I would like to hear from those that are less than 90%. What at this point is keeping you from feeling stronger that it is Joe?
Paul and I both agree that if you think the newspaper photo and T202 panel were taken at the same time that it must be Joe. Do you disagree with this? Do you have doubts about the two photos being taken at the same time? As I've become more comfortable with my position I would like to hear more from the other side. 
|
|
#2
05-26-2010, 05:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
90-99 percent here. I am curious as to the rationale of folks who felt it was less than 50 percent, if they care to share -- are we missing something?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
|
|
#3
05-26-2010, 05:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
50%??? I would love to hear the rationale from the person that says 0%. Even if you are skeptical, what is the reasoning behind a "NO WAY" call? Is the person that said no way, the person that took the picture or a spectator that day
 I would find it really hard to give a flat out 0% chance. Just my opinion. r/ Frank
__________________
100+ satisfied customers since 2007 _____________________________________________ Last edited by Tcards-Please; 05-26-2010 at 05:55 PM. Reason: punctuation
|
|
#4
05-26-2010, 07:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ditto what Tim, Peter, and Frank said.
Clayton
|
|
#5
05-26-2010, 08:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 Now that I have read the entire thread, I'd vote in the 80% range. Good stuff!
|
|
#6
05-26-2010, 08:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
05-26-2010, 10:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I clicked 81%-90%.
I do not feel completely 100% comfortable in saying the two photos are of the same play. The newspaper photo is just too dark and grainy for me to make an intelligent decision. I see what I think are anomalies between the two photos, and until they are completely resolved, I just can't say that it is Joe Jackson on the T202. Steve
|
|
#8
05-26-2010, 10:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do These Joe Jackson Cards Exist? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-08-2013 10:11 AM |
| Joe Jackson? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-22-2008 06:45 PM |
| GOUDEYS, PLAY BALL JOE JACKSON, DOUBLE PLAY DIMAGGIO | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-03-2008 12:37 AM |
| i need a shoeless joe jackson 1940 playball | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-02-2008 11:13 PM |
| New Joe Jackson Pre-Rookie Card Discovered | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 02-11-2008 07:53 AM |
Hybrid Mode
