![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Well done, Ted.
This is further evidence that the Stark brown Old Mill card in the Goodwin auction (#98) is bogus. SGC really looks bad on this one. I see that Goodwin has pulled #98 from the auction. What was SGC thinking? Ron R |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there proof it is bogus?? Ted says this is a theory and not conclusive proof. I would be more worried about those OM overprints. Why would they use a red overprint on them. Does not make sense. But nothing really does when there is no proof it is valid or not.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regarding your......
"Ted says this is a theory and not conclusive proof." Please read my complete explanation that I presented in the 1st and 2nd posts here, as it details why there is a very high probability that Dolly Stark is not possible with a Brown OLD MILL back. And, regarding the Brown OLD MILL factory #649 red overprint cards.....we just covered this subject a couple of months ago. You posted in it, so go back and review this entire thread...... http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...ght=brown+mill TED Z |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am with Tim that Mullaney belongs on the list of confirmed brown Old Mill.
I would think as long as we have kept track of brown Hindu we have all the confirmed examples of the southern leaguers that exist. If another does turn up I would think it would not be one of the six Texas League players. I think it is possible that when the Stark in question got submitted to SGC someone wrote brown on the submission and that is the reason it is on the flip. It is a mistake-it happens. There have been mistakes where Heinie was mislabeled Honus and all that means is that it was a mistake-it is not a 2 million dollar card because it is labeled Honus. So the Stark is not a 4 or 5 thousand dollar card because it is labeled brown. It is a 75 dollar black Old Mill with a mislabeled flip. Unless the owner of the card can prove they paid brown Old Mill money for the card. That is the only way the Stark is any more than 75 bucks.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JIM
I could have added Mullaney to the confirmed list. But, the Brown OLD MILL printing on it is inverted. Is this the case with any of the 10 cards we have listed here ? TED Z |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leon can confirm this but I don't believe the Old Mill is inverted on this card. I think the back scan was inverted to better show the Young image.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
UPDATED....April 24, 2010
Listed here are the 34 Southern Leaguers that possibly can be found with Brown OLD MILL backs. To date, 11 of them that have been confirmed.......... Bay Bernhard....................Brown OLD MILL Breitenstein Carey Coles Cranston Ellam Foster........................Brown OLD MILL Fritz Greminger...................Brown OLD MILL Guiheen Helm..........................Brown OLD MILL Hickman Hooker Howard Jordan Kiernan......................Brown OLD MILL Lafitte Lipe Manion McCauley Molesworth Mullaney....................Brown OLD MILL Otey Paige.........................Brown OLD MILL Perdue Persons Reagan.......................Brown OLD MILL Revelle.......................Brown OLD MILL Ryan Shaughnessy Smith (Atlanta)............Brown OLD MILL Thornton.....................Brown OLD MILL Violat Assuming my conjecture is valid, then this Southern Leaguer group of 14 cards will NOT be found with a Brown OLD MILL back. Bastian Hart (Little Rock) Hart (Montgomery) King Lentz Miller Orth Rockenfeld Seitz Smith (Shreveport) Stark Thebo Westlake White (Houston) Perhaps, someone on this forum will prove me wrong regarding these 14 cards......and, post one of these with a Brown OLD MILL back. In any event, let's see more of your Brown OLD MILL's ? TED Z |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's been reported that all of the known Brown OLD MILL cards are hand-cut.
Is this really true....that none of them are factory-cut ? TED Z |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
inverted is upside down I think and I would still count it because it is brown-although that card has alot going on with all those backs printed in all directions-but I do think upside down counts
Batch.jpg Batchb.jpg
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hopefully Leon will chime in to set the record straight. But, it's my understanding that the OLD MILL printing
is inverted from the front picture. TED Z |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted here's a link with images of the Mullaney in the holder. You can see from the flip that the Brown Old Mill was printed correctly in regards to the front.
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...light=mullaney |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All Cards SOLD!!!! | Kotton King | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 09-08-2009 10:54 AM |
T206 OLD MILL survey......UPDATED | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 08-29-2009 10:09 AM |
FS T206 Cubs Cards Brown, Lundgren, Reulbach & Schulte PRICED INDIVIDUALLY | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 01-22-2008 03:09 PM |
2 T206 Brown Hindu Cards BOTH SOLD | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 01-01-2008 07:09 PM |
Classics Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-14-2005 10:53 PM |