 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12
05-16-2010, 12:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I can't tell you from the scans, but if the paper is thin, the image is sharp (as it appears to be) and the back is toned, it could be original. Early 1900s photo paper was thinner and modern photo paper usually bright white on back. If the paper seems very thin compared to modern photos, that' your best sign it's vintage.
One thing is 10x12 is an unusual size for a photo back then. On the other hand, that's an unusual size for a modern reprint too. The vast majority of 1950s- reprints of old baseball images like that are 8x10. As I said, I can't tell you it's original just from the scans, but I also don't see anything that says it isn't. Last edited by drc; 05-16-2010 at 01:24 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Original 1971 Washington Senators Team Photograph Photo | joedawolf | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2010 05:15 PM |
| circa 1911 McGill Harvard incredible composite photo in original frame | baseballart | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 08-11-2009 07:06 PM |
| Large Ted Williams Original Photo on Mount | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 01-24-2009 06:35 PM |
| FS - Lot of 10 Original Willie Pep boxing match 4x5 photo negatives | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 07-22-2008 12:50 PM |
| Hans Lobert Items Wanted | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 12-05-2006 07:57 AM |
Threaded Mode