![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: SGC Grade | |||
40 VG 3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
135 | 76.70% |
50 VG/EX 4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 21.02% |
60 EX 5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.14% |
70 EX+ 5.5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.14% |
80 EX/NM 6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice orange bordered T210!
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just looking at the card before I saw the choices, I was debating between a 30 and a 40 and decided to go with 40 due to eye appeal.
JimB |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
easy 40 if the discoloration on the front right is just scanner or normal fading and not paper loss.
__________________
One post max per thread. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No paper loss. The card has the typical sheen of a T210. My guess is the discoloration, which is the lack of print dots, came from the manufacturing process. Wonder if other examples have the same issue?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
my choice would have been a 30, but 40 was my closest option.
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it should be an easy 40. The card is in very good condition. I know TPGs want to be tough but the end result is extremely vague grading in the 10-30 range. The card has has eye appeal somewhere between very good and excellent, of course the vgex grade is reserved for something else. (?)
Edited: PSA 4 Last edited by Matthew H; 09-29-2010 at 06:06 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
awww why is this being dragged out even more? i thought a bump finally means the grade is in...haven't been able to sleep the last few months waiting for result. i'm hoping you went with an expedited grading tier!
__________________
One post max per thread. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 2 minor wrinkles drops this card to a SGC 40.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These two I sent in pulled 30's,and yours looks Waaay better,imho.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's basically a no-brainer SGC 40. The 2 creases keep it out of 50 land, and the sharp corners and otherwise cleanliness of the card keep it out of 30 land. I did not even realize SGC 30 was not an option. The creasing would have to be more substantial than visible in the scan to drop it below an SGC 40.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I voted 40- but would have voted 30 if the option was available.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The toughest 1957 Topps Card in High Grade | Archive | Basketball / Cricket / Tennis Cards Forum | 11 | 11-04-2007 09:00 AM |
Why would SGC not grade this card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 08-13-2005 03:37 PM |
Three of the same card, same grade. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-16-2005 11:47 AM |
low grade wagner card needed | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 04-29-2005 12:44 PM |
Board opinion on grade of this card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 01-22-2004 06:40 AM |