1915 W-Unc cards- Redux

[Brian Van Horn]

I hate to disagree with Lew, but the Lobert is, in my opinion, undoubtedly a strip card. I have a Rucker which is the same size:

[Brian Van Horn]

One clarification:

The Lobert and the Rucker cards are the same size, but the picture for the Lobert is sizably larger side to side, but matches top to bottom.

[nolemmings]

The Lobert and the Rucker cards are the same size, but the picture for the Lobert is sizably larger side to side, but matches top to bottom.

This is why I don't believe they are form the same set, although I admit they have similarities.

BTW, even if the same size, why do you believe these are strip cards? The edges are so badly worn that it is impossible to tell if they were hand-cut, IMO, but to my eye they at least appear evenly cut along the edges, if you don't consider centering.

[Leon]

My guess is the the Irwin and Lobert are the same size as the others, give or take a 64th, just like the other 2 that Lew said he thought were from the same set (and there is no debating their size). I am going with same set. Maybe more information will be found in the future. This kind of stuff keeps it interesting for me....thanks again

also, the 2 cards of Lobert and Irwin have the same cropping of the photo like the team composite I showed. I would bet their physical sizes are similar, which has been my main point.

[Brian Van Horn]

Todd,

The reasons I think they are strip cards is the variance of the sizes of the cards. Admittedly, the Lobert and the Rucker are the same top to bottom and side to side. Am I contradicting my previous post? No.

Also, the cut on the cards. The Lobert and the Rucker as well as the other cards I have posted have the same right border (of course, you have to stand up the Maranville), but the left border is gone from the Lobert. Finally, based on the samples from both sets listed by Lipset, and from the cards of Leon and myself, the borders and size vary.

Now, you can make the same argument for overall size of the E121s, but that is for another day....

[nolemmings]

Leon, I guess we're just talking past each other. The Lobert and Irwin might be the same size, but I can make an Exhibit the same size as a Topps card, and that doesn't make them the same. There is no side border on the Irwin and Lobert. The area comprised by the photo is larger on those cards--that is not cropping. If indeed they were hand-cut, then someone cut the borders off just so they would be the same size--not unlike how some pre-war cards were allegedly trimmed so that the collector's cards would all be uniform. If so, they came from different sets, IMHO.

Brian, you completely lost me when you say the cards you posted have the same right border.

[Leon]

I might be using the wrong terminology. I believe the composite team card, and the Irwin and Lobert cards, all are similar in size (maybe not exact but very close) and have the same photo size, with respect to the card. All 3 have similar borders. To me, that makes them all similar. ALL of the whole group of 25+ cards, in the auction, had very similar characteristics overall too. So, to me, until I see more than what was stated I am going with the same set theory. I could be wrong but the evidence is weighted towards them being the same set, imo. It's a good debate. Maybe I am just longing for more good debate on the board and less negativity? regards


edited to add- I think the borders were in fact cut off in order for them all to be the same size, but I think it was done at time of mfg.....again, another theory

[Brian Van Horn]

Todd,

Just to clarify, the right side has a black border on the edge of the picture on all the cards I posted. The cutting of the Lobert doesn't have a defined left border unlike the other four cards.