![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Over the course of three years and millions of cards printed American Lithograph did not change the printing specifications for the cards. They didn't change card stock, add gloss, change the color of the player identification, etc.
Why if the Cobb/Cobb was part of the same issue would they stray from their specifications for just this one card and not any others before or after? This is what leads me to believe that ATC did not consider this card to be part of the same project, or someone else like F.R. Penn was responsible for the cards issue. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree, except for the perplexingly narrow American Beauty's.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This was a cutting issue, the last process for the cards. This had no effect on how the cards were printed. The American Beauty's were printed just like all the other cards.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe, maybe not.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Dave -
I think I see where this could be headed and it's a whole other topic of discussion. What I meant by the AB's were printed just like all the other cards I was referring to paper stock, images, caption color, no gloss, etc. Same as the other cards. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gotcha
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Did any other t206s come out of factory 33? Does that matter?
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
![]() |
|
|