Cobb back is not T206 and here's why...

[tedzan]

1st....what does the Catholic Church have to do with this subject matter ? ?

2nd....regarding your comment...."time of issue (completely unknown and unproven)"

IS TOTALLY FALSE !


We have Macon, Georgia Newpaper clippings reporting of this card in the Spring of 1910.

FURTHERMORE, Senator Russell's T206 and T210 collection (on display at the U. of Georgia) includes
a Ty Cobb back card. It is documented.....Mr. Russell collected his tobacco cards as a teenager in the
year of 1910. Therefore, American Litho. printed & issued this card in 1910.......

DO YOU GET IT, NOW ?


Once again, if you bothered to use the SEARCH feature on this forum you would have learned all this.
Before you made these erroneous comments.



TED Z

[ChiefBenderForever]

The Catholic church made some wonderful issues, I have a great Jesus RC with a rare Judas back.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by JohnnyHarmonica

The Catholic church made some wonderful issues, I have a great Jesus RC with a rare Judas back.

This was always one of my favorites.

[Chicago206]

Originally Posted by tedzan

1st....what does the Catholic Church have to do with this subject matter ? ?

2nd....regarding your comment...."time of issue (completely unknown and unproven)"

IS TOTALLY FALSE !


We have Macon, Georgia Newpaper clippings reporting of this card in the Spring of 1910.

FURTHERMORE, Senator Russell's T206 and T210 collection (on display at the U. of Georgia) includes
a Ty Cobb back card. It is documented.....Mr. Russell collected his tobacco cards as a teenager in the
year of 1910. Therefore, American Litho. printed & issued this card in 1910.......

DO YOU GET IT, NOW ?


Once again, if you bothered to use the SEARCH feature on this forum you would have learned all this.
Before you made these erroneous comments.



TED Z

Ok, I aquired my Kirby Puckett rookie card in 2009. Does that definitively prove that the Kirby Puckett was produced in 2009??? See how silly you sound?

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Chicago206

Ok, I aquired my Kirby Puckett rookie card in 2009. Does that definitively prove that the Kirby Puckett was produced in 2009??? See how silly you sound?

You really aren't very bright, are you?

It does prove that it wasn't produced in 2014.

[Chicago206]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

You really aren't very bright, are you?

There isnt a single logician in the world who would agree with Ted's following statement:




"FURTHERMORE, Senator Russell's T206 and T210 collection (on display at the U. of Georgia) includes
a Ty Cobb back card. It is documented.....Mr. Russell collected his tobacco cards as a teenager in the
year of 1910. Therefore, American Litho. printed & issued this card in 1910......."



It simply makes zero logical sense at all. I used the Puckett analogy to make this easier for people like you to understand the point Jim.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Chicago206

I used the Puckett analogy to make this easier for people like you to understand the point Jim.

Well, that didn't work. Better find another tactic

Ted's point was that the card could not have dated to a later year if it's documented that someone had it in 1910. So... 1910 or earlier.

[Abravefan11]

I really wanted to hear what a few board members thought about a couple of things concerning this card but as soon as Chicago posted I lost any chance of that happening.

Some people just suck the air out of the room.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Abravefan11

I really wanted to hear what a few board members thought about a couple of things concerning this card but as soon as Chicago posted I lost any chance of that happening.

Some people just suck the air out of the room.

Nah! We can go on without him!

[whitehse]

Originally Posted by tedzan

1st....what does the Catholic Church have to do with this subject matter ? ?

2nd....regarding your comment...."time of issue (completely unknown and unproven)"

IS TOTALLY FALSE !


We have Macon, Georgia Newpaper clippings reporting of this card in the Spring of 1910.

FURTHERMORE, Senator Russell's T206 and T210 collection (on display at the U. of Georgia) includes
a Ty Cobb back card. It is documented.....Mr. Russell collected his tobacco cards as a teenager in the
year of 1910. Therefore, American Litho. printed & issued this card in 1910.......

DO YOU GET IT, NOW ?


Once again, if you bothered to use the SEARCH feature on this forum you would have learned all this.
Before you made these erroneous comments.



TED Z

Ted...why do you even bother...I just dont think a certain someone will ever get it or even entertain an idea that is not his own. I understand there are questions on this card but like all the others ...if there is no definitive evidence to make a change....the classification needs to stay where its at! I wouldnt even waste your breath on this one because if he has nobody to argue with maybe he will just go away!! We can only hope!!

[Robextend]

Myself probably like some others on this board are more or less T206 novices. I love learning about all aspects of the monster. But how many times can the same issue be revisited without having any substantial value added?

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Robextend

But how many times can the same issue be revisited without having any substantial value added?

1,288,943 ..... we have a ways to go!!

[Chicago206]

Originally Posted by Robextend

Myself probably like some others on this board are more or less T206 novices. I love learning about all aspects of the monster. But how many times can the same issue be revisited without having any substantial value added?

I think you are missing the key element. The "substantial value" part is actually added each time this topic comes up. If there werent a strong case against the card, you wouldnt see nearly as many...if any threads on it. The fact that this topic is so frequently discussed IS the substantial added value!

[Robextend]

That is why every time I see any T206 thread appear I make sure I read every post, however I am not seeing anything new from the last few on the Cobb/Cobb discussion. I'm not saying not to start new threads on it, just an observation.