![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think maybe a more difficult question to answer is why he was not included in the T205 and/or T207 sets. By early 1911, he was at least a very hot prospect that would have merited inclusion in the T205 set. After that season, he was a bona fide star and should have been a no-brainer for the 1912 T207 set. In fact, he was mentioned as a star player on the backs of two other cards in that set. Perhaps there was a contractual issue that kept him off of tobacco issues as his stats and status were surely worthy of his inclusion.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found this on Ebay several years ago,thought it was a great novelty piece.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But there are a few New Orleans Pelicans in the SL series, who were teammates of Jackson at the time. He could have been included among those players.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All the more impressive that he showed up in the E90-1 American Caramel Series from 1909
top 10 card in the hobby? ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 2006, I posted my theory on why the T206 Plank was yanked. This theory actually referred to a "larger picture",
where the American Caramel Co. prevented the American Tobacco Co. from depicting Philadelphia A's players. This theory is the result of several factors, including these two...... (1) The 1st Series of the Philadelphia-based E90-1 set preceded the 1st series of the T206 set. It depicts these A's HR Baker Jack Barry Chief Bender Eddie Collins Harry Davis Jimmy Dygert Heinie Heitmuller Joe Jackson <<<<<<<<< Harry Krause Stuffy McInnis Eddie Plank Ira Thomas (2) The withholding of the Collins (batting) card from the 1st series of T206's provides further support for this theory. ![]() Now, as Joe Jackson's 1908-09 stats (that Jim R has posted) show, Joe was no "big deal" playing in Philadelphia. Besides, Danny Murphy was the hometown favorite and Joe Jax wasn't about to replace Danny. Connie Mack preferred recruiting College ball players; and, Joe Jax just did not fit with the A's. He was sent to the Minors and in July 1910, Connie Mack traded him to Cleveland. Joe Jax started realizing his true ability playing for Cleveland in 1911, as he batted .408 in 147 games. Production of the T206 cards ceased in the Spring of 1911....so, the REAL question should be....why wasn't Joe Jax in the T205 set ? TED Z |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Good stuff Ted Z.
the value of the E90 is certainly aided by the fact that there is no Jackson T206 or T205... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SURVEY: T206 Joe Doyle N.Y (missing partial Y & period) - - - 4th variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-20-2011 02:15 PM |
New Joe Jackson Pre-Rookie Card Discovered | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 02-11-2008 07:53 AM |
Another Joe Jackson T5 cabinet question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-26-2006 12:29 PM |
1919 W514 Joe Jackson question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-23-2006 04:15 AM |
Ranking Joe Jackson | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 03-08-2006 09:22 AM |