 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-26-2010, 01:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#4
04-26-2010, 03:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The top left part of the frame not only is not square, it appears to be missing altogether? Are there other examples of this type of printing error on other T206s? It probably is related to the bleeding, and probably is just one of those things...
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading.
|
|
#5
04-26-2010, 04:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Methinks someone has some spaining to do.
|
|
#6
04-26-2010, 04:38 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
paper loss
In speaking with another hobby veteran about that upper left corner he believes it's just a little paper loss. I probably concur on that one point. regards
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#7
04-26-2010, 04:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
People that own a Cobb/Cobb card are going to say that the price was fair and the card was legit -- because it affects them financially. People that depend on Goodwin's auctions for financial reasons are gong to say the same thing -- because it affects them financially. Follow the dollars and you'll find out motivations of posters.
As for the auction, I'm not saying that it wasn't legit. I'm also not saying that if it wasn't legit that Goodwin was at fault. I just would say that the price was a joke because a) it has no gloss (which to me is a problem, not a positive); the bleeding issue is weird; c) the left corner issue is weird; d) the registration of the card is weird. I'm no expert on Cobb/Cobb but these issues are troubling and I've never seen issues b) and c) on any Cobb/Cobb before. These are red flags to me and surely should not cause the price of the card to triple in value. The card very well may be real but, again, the red flags are troubling and do not serve to enhance the card's value. I've bid on Cobb cards up to 100K; I can tell you that I wouldn't have bid 30K for this card. Just my opinion.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets Last edited by calvindog; 04-26-2010 at 05:25 PM.
|
|
#9
04-26-2010, 06:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree, it doesn't look like paper loss on the hi-res scan. The other thing i notice is all 4 corners are evenly rounded... not alot of cards have uniform perfect rounding on all corners.
just my two centavos worth
__________________
"There is no such thing as over educated! It is better to be quiet and thought of as a fool then to open your mouth and remove all doubt!!
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT: Auction for Ruth and Bernie's card collection | dwinters | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-11-2009 06:41 PM |
| National Card Investors Auction | NATCARD | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 10-30-2009 09:38 PM |
| Auction: 1936 National Chicle Fine Pens R313 White Sox Team Card | vintagesportflips | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 0 | 09-13-2009 07:10 AM |
| Japanese card auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-23-2006 06:44 AM |
| Auction Fever: Just in case you thought it only affected card collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 08-28-2004 05:57 PM |
!
Hybrid Mode
