List of known Red HINDU's....can you add any new ones ?

[Chicago206]

That brings me to yet another question Ted. I often see you basing the relative scarcity of different backs as a function of how many confirmed subjects can be found on each. This would only be accurate if the actual print runs of the 2 different backs were identical, correct? For example, lets assume there are 60 known subjects with Uzit backs, and 40 or so known subjects with RH backs. If there were 100 of each of those Uzit players printed, and 300 of each of the RH's printed, obviously a random RH back would be far more common than an Uzit back. Does my reasoning make any sense to you?

[Blunder19]

The seymour throwing is on your list as confirmed red hindus. I have never seen one, seen a sale of one, or heard of someone who says they own one. Can you confirm how you know the seymour throwing has the Red Hindu back?

Jamie

[Chicago206]

Just came in the mail today. Lovely card!

[tedzan]

We have no way of measuring how many cards were actually printed of a particular back. But, we do have the
ability to ascertain which T206 subjects were printed (and therefore issued) with which backs. And, this has
proven over a period of 30+ years of tracking T206's, that it is a fairly accurate gauge in determining how rare
a particular back is.
The fact that UZIT's were printed later in the game (Spring of 1911) is indicative that these cards were perhaps
printed in lesser quantities. But again, I will reiterate, we have no way of factually knowing this.


TED Z

[B O'Brien]

I never really wanted one of these until I had one!
Thanks,
Bob

[cfc1909]

Magee.jpgMageeb.jpg

[wonkaticket]

They are neat.