![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Perfect subject for a poll. Absolute rarity.
__________________
The other white JP.... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some things are RARE b/c they are the only ones in a high grade, put that in your pipe and SMOKE it!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah, that would be one of the two choices -- conditional rarity. Me thinks you didn't read the thread starter...
__________________
The other white JP.... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Which happens to be the very definition of "conditional rarity". ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
JP and Chicago T206...were you guys separated at birth?
Absolute rarity reigns supreme...I'll take a box of g-vg's over a few mints any day of the year! |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Chicago, rarity all the way.
You do realize there is more than one pre-war set right!?! (ie there are cards beyond T206's) It is kinda funny hearing T206 and rare in the same sentence, while I admit there are tougher backs within the T206 set there are no RARE T206 players (outside of the Doyle perhaps). -Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rarity for me.
When dealing with truly "rare" cards you can't be condition sensitive, you take what you can get. If you can afford to wait for a better example to come along, it's probably not rare. IMO Last edited by Abravefan11; 04-18-2010 at 09:34 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rarity ..... Low grade is fine with me, as long as the players image is OK overall.
I like pinholed rare cards ![]() PS Love that E223 Comiskey, thats a truly rare card! Last edited by fkw; 04-18-2010 at 11:52 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why? Because he decided to write exactly what I did, 15 minutes after I did? I happen to disagree with almost everything he has said since he came here, so I doubt we're related.
One of the things I love in the t206 set are common backs that are condition sensitive. Like Polar Bears without tobacco stains or some ABs that look too thin to not be trimmed, but are legit.
__________________
The other white JP.... Last edited by JP; 04-18-2010 at 09:55 PM. Reason: iPhone thinks it is funny to autocorrect words that are correctly spelled... |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice Comiskey!
__________________
The other white JP.... |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
Tony A. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And more are being made each day. That is the problem. And those not only don't smoke well they are also worth a fraction of what people think they are.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I guess I'm somewhere in the middle-I like mid-grade common's & HOF'ers with semi-scarce backs........
Clayton |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rarity | Bicem | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 111 | 07-24-2009 12:17 PM |
Relative Rarity of T205 Matty with Diff. Ad Brands | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 11-19-2008 04:52 AM |
Perceived or Real? rarity of 1967 B Robby, 1970 Bench | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 32 | 10-11-2007 08:23 AM |
Rarity argument at work today | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-25-2006 12:27 PM |
Why isn't Rarity the No.1 factor in determining a card's value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-06-2006 06:59 PM |