|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim,
I think that this is the best (most accurate) listing of back types. I agree with everything that has been written with one significant exception. I do not believe that AB 460 is nearly as tough as you rank it. Back in the 1980s when my dad and I purchased significant lots (or even entire sets) of T206 cards and before people really cared much about backs, we would always find at least one (many times 2 or 3) AB 460 in the collection. While we would also find at least one hindu (usually more).... other cards like CB and certainly Broadleaf were not always part of the collection. My opinion based solely on my personal collecting experience is that AB 460 should appear as rarer than Hindu but not as rare as CB. Regards, Scott |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ted
I think Lee and Scott are right on AB 460-I think you are looking at it as trying to complete the AB 460 sub set rather than just getting an example of AB 460. It surely is more difficult to get 60 or more different examples of AB 460 or Cycle 460 than it is to get an example to complete your back set. 1. Old Mill brown 2. Lenox brown 3. Broad Leaf 460 4. Uzit 5. Drum 6. Hindu red 7. Lenox black 8. Broad Leaf 350 9. Blank -might want to take this one off the list all together 10. Carolina Brights 11. American Beauty 460 12. Hindu brown 13. American Beauty 350 no frame 14. Sovereign 460-(the six super prints are very difficult with this back) 15. Cycle 460 16. Piedmont 350-460 factory 42 17. Tolstoi 18. Sweet Caporal 350-460 factory 25 19. EPDG 20. American Beauty 350 frame 21. Sovereign 350 apple green -350-460 series cards only (66 cards) 22. Sweet Caporal 350-460 factory 42 23. Cycle 350 24. Old Mill south 25. Sovereign 150 26. Sweet Caporal 150 factory 649 overprint 27. Sweet Caporal 350-460 factory 42 scroll 28. Old Mill 29. Polar Bear 30. Sovereign 350 series forest green 31. Sweet Caporal 150 factory 25 32. Sweet Caporal 350-460 factory 30 33. Sweet Caporal 150 factory 30 34. Piedmont 150 factory 25 35. Piedmont 350-460 factory 25 36. Sweet Caporal 350 factory 25 37. Sweet Caporal 350 factory 30 38. Piedmont 350 factory 25 either way AB 460 is tough and it is only moving between 8 and 11 and that is pretty close as each collectors expierence is different.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
FWIW, I was able to snag a very pretty AB460 in a SGC 50 off ebay as a BIN for $125 about a month ago. You will NEVER see a BL350 in that grade sell for anywhere close to $125. BL350 is tougher than AB460.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=250583328186 Last edited by Chicago206; 03-24-2010 at 09:17 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think the list looks pretty good right now.
It doesn't matter much since they probably shouldn't be in there anyways, but I'd switch the blank back and the broadleaf 350s. I've had over a dozen Broadleaf backs since 1999 and one blank back while going after and following both. PS: I have a feeling we'll be having a blank back discussion soon. Rob |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can we add the Ty Cobb brand to the list? I think most people probably also consider the Coupon Type 1 to be a T206, but maybe re-designating is more controversial. I am curious to know where you think it would belong on the list.
Thanks, JimB |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Can you name a single T206 cigarette brand that features just 1 subject? Can you name a single T206 cigarette brand that features a glossy front surface on 85% of the known cards? Why should the Cobb back be considered a part of the T206 set? Because thats how it was categorized 70 years ago? Things change, they evolve as more info becomes available. Just remember that the same guy who called the Cobb/Cobb a T206 card, also called an Uzit an "Usit".
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
In response to your questions here, Jefferson Burdick is the person who invented the classification scheme that is still used today, including the designation "T206". Nowhere does he indicate the number of subjects that need to be on the fronts of advertising backs. Nor does he indicate that a glossy front would eliminate a card from consideration. He lists all the advertising brands included with the T206 designation and the one quality they all have in common is that they all advertised American Tobacco Company products between 1909-1911. A typo on the spelling of Uzit is hardly evidence that the Ty Cobb brand should be disqualified. There was debate a few years ago about wether the Ty Cobb brand was a brand issued by the ATC and if so, when it was issued. That debate was resolved last year with period newspaper articles and other evidence that Ted Z produced about a period collection. FYI, the recent find of two new examples also appeared within a larger period collection of T206s. If you want to change the classification system and establish your own criteria for designation, more power to you. If it is convincing enough, I am sure the collecting world will follow you. You should use a term other than "T206" however because T206 includes brands like Ty Cobb and American Beauty that have physical qualities that differ from the other brands in most cases. And you might want to consider the exclusion of Polar Bear since that was the only brand where the cards were placed with loose tobacco as opposed to cigarettes. JimB Last edited by E93; 03-24-2010 at 12:54 PM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the final defense of my position regarding AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 scarcity.....I agree with Jim R in that if you
are just looking for a "Type Back", certain AB 460 cards might not be as tough as, say a given BROAD LEAF 350. And this is true, if any AB 460 will do. The following AB 460 cards are quite often seen...... Crandall (portrait-cap) Devore Duffy Ford McGraw (glove at hip) Tannehill (Chicago) Most of the other 70 - AB 460 cards are seldom seen, here are some of them...... Conroy (bat) Lajoie (bat) Smith (Chicago & Boston) Tinker (bat off shoulder) White (pitching) Wilhelm (bat) Therefore, if you are trying to collect this sub-set of 73-77 cards, I can guarantee you that it will be a challenge that will continue for many years. Hey guys, am I the only one here (besides Lee B) that collects these various T206 sub-sets ? TED Z |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
A couple other observations about the list. I do believe the Piedmont Fact 42 is tougher than the Cycle 460. I learned early on how to spot a Pied 42 and I was only able to accumulate 3 in my quest of the T206 set. The other back I think is severely is the SC 460 25. When I finished I had only 3 in my collection, I really believe they may be tougher than Cycle 460.
Jim's observations are correct about finding single examples of Cycle, ABs and others. Sometimes it is easy to find a single example but to find certain examples can be very difficult. I wanted to add my adjustments: 11. Hindu 12. Pied 42 13- 15. Cycle, AB and Sov in any order 16. Sweet cap 460 25 17. AB 350 NO Frame Lee Last edited by Sterling Sports Auctions; 03-24-2010 at 11:47 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
cobb/cobb would be #3...if it were a t206...and I'd place coupon I's at 7 or 8.
Last edited by ullmandds; 03-24-2010 at 12:56 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Backs set | cfc1909 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 12-08-2015 07:24 PM |
| The T206 350-Only Series - Some Observations on Available Backs | jimonym | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-07-2009 09:23 PM |
| T206 Backs, top 10 rarest | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-04-2008 10:50 PM |
| Clear your walls, the T206 Backs Framed Display Pieces are Here! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-27-2006 05:59 PM |
| t206 backs, mainly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-03-2005 06:55 AM |