![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim - I noticed the Fact 42 Piedmont slid way down on your list. Interesting... I know there was a thread a few weeks back where dozens of folks were debating if Fact 42 Piedmont fell between #7 or #8 on the toughest backs list. You have it pegged way down to #16 on your list... Obviously know none of this is perfect science, but was curious as to your thoughts on that back. I know you have handled many of these over the last decade.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Backs set | cfc1909 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 12-08-2015 06:24 PM |
The T206 350-Only Series - Some Observations on Available Backs | jimonym | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-07-2009 08:23 PM |
T206 Backs, top 10 rarest | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-04-2008 09:50 PM |
Clear your walls, the T206 Backs Framed Display Pieces are Here! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 12-27-2006 04:59 PM |
t206 backs, mainly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-03-2005 05:55 AM |