|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very nice looking...solid for the grade, I would be very happy with that card.
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Awesome card - I'll be lucky if I ever have a Gerhrig as nice as that in my '33 Goudey set.
P.S. - I hope you used Bing Cashback. Last edited by Irwin Fletcher; 03-08-2010 at 12:58 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks for the input guys, I was pretty sure it was a good deal but I wanted to check.
By the way, has anyone noticed a value difference between the #92 and the #160 Gehrig? |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The #160 seems to carry a little more of a premium but it all depends on who is selling when, but I believe that the #160 is a little tougher to come by.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree - my understanding is that the #160 is the tougher card, but only slightly so.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't envy snow white borders, that just means the card has been cleaned up. Nice pickup.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think you got a good deal. I paid significantly more for my SGC 80.
...not much difference grade wise between a 5.5 and a 6, ya know? BTW, I agree with the others that the #160 carries a touch of a price premium compared to the #92. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1933 Goudey #92 Lou Gehrig....changed to auction format,,,ends 10PM EST | wolfdogg | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 13 | 08-27-2009 09:02 PM |
| Looking to purchase 1933 Goudey PSA 8s | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-23-2009 09:19 PM |
| WTB or Trade for a 1933 Goudey PSA 5 Gehrig | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-23-2008 12:23 PM |
| Help Requested | 1933 Goudey #92 Lou Gehrig | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 04-27-2008 07:42 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig **ORIGINAL** Item number: 2759367720 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-15-2003 08:21 PM |