Looking for input from Photo Collectors

[slidekellyslide]

Of course subject matter is the most important to me, but after that I prefer Type 1 photos, condition doesn't matter as much as long as it's not in such poor shape that it affects the image, the caption is not important to me at all if I already know what the photo represents, but I do like a date stamp. It is not important to me at all to know who the photographer was. I suppose my answer will be representative of most who are more concerned about subject matter above all else.

[oriolesbb6]

Content by far, then clarity, then date stamp, then photog. Its all about the subject matter...I do prefer type 1 or the rare personal sports photo.

[Robbie]

Hi Dan...

Thanks for your response. A question... Considering many captions have dates on them, and of course include a description of the event or subject, would you still prefer just a date stamp?

Thank you also to oriolesbb6. When you say "date stamp" do you mean an issuer stamp or simple date, i.e. ... OCT 14 1955.

Thank you guys!

[slidekellyslide]

I don't mind the captions on the back, but am not a big fan if the caption extends out beyond the frame of the photo (makes it harder to display or store)...I also am not a fan of captions on the front of photos like the one below, but I take what I can get if the subject matter is in my wheelhouse.

[Jantz]

Robbie

First off, I'm a rookie in this department, but I have a small collection of photos.

I like "date specific" photos such as a photo of a World Series game or an All-Star Game. I also like photos that show other events, not just poses or action shots. For instance, I have a photo of Bob Feller with the Marble Champion from Akron, Ohio playing marbles in the on-deck circle before a game. Interesting photo since Mr. Feller is only 19 in the photo and marble champion looks to be maybe 17. It looks like just two average boys playing marbles, but one is a professional baseball player of course.

As far as the photographer and captions, I don't focus much on that except I do like when the photo has the newspaper slug on the back. I also leave any markings on the front of the photo alone. I know some collectors remove them, but I actually like them there. Condition isn't really a big factor with me either.


Hope this helps

Jantz

[Robbie]

Hi Jantz...

I like your Bob Feller photo description. I believe he was pitching in the majors before he even graduated high school! A true phenom in his time. Thanks for your input.

Robert >>

[Jantz]

Robert

Yes, he was young when he started with the Indians. This got Cleveland into some hot water too. I was once told that the Yankees were waiting in the wings with a large offer if Cleveland had to cancel his initial contract, but Landis allowed him to stay with Cleveland.

Hope you don't mind a visual... After looking at the photo again, I think the marble champ may be a little younger than I posted earlier. All I know is that this photo was a "must have" for my collection.

Hope you enjoy

Jantz

[drc]

The photographer does matter, but the photographer is rarely listed on a news photo so it usually doesn't matter. If the listed photographer is very famous, add a premium. If the photographer isn't listed or isn't very famous, don't worry about it.

The stamps and captions are important in that they help establish age and originality, especially for lay people. I prefer a good stamp or identifying tag on the back of a photo, whether it's from a newspaper or Vogue magazine. It's easier to resell a photo that has such identification on back, especially if the claim is it's by a famous photographer ... Many wirephotos have the caption on the front, so obviously in those instances an additional stamp or tag on back isn't required.

Image subject (ala Babe Ruth, famous particular game) is important along with quality of the image (clarity, artistry, uniqueness, even humor).

As far as condition goes, look at overall presentation value, in particular of the image. A wrinkle or crease to the white border pretty much means nothing, though a crease through the image would. Some honest wear that doesn't effect the image might not lower the value. With a vintage photo, grade Ex should be worth about the same as grade Near Mint. No one should care that an edge isn't Gem Mint. Realize that baseball card grades are applied to cards were thousands to tends of thousands of a card were made. With that 1909 Ty Cobb, there will be no more than a few in existence. Worry about overall presentation value, not razor sharpness of edges and corners.

Besides, you won't find Pre-WWI news photos that are Gem Mint. If you find one, its probably either a reprint or was trimmed. News photos were production items literally paper thin, and didn't last to today in Gem Mint condition. Dings and toning and wrinkles are the norm.