What's the deal with this T206 on ebay?

[JP]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

LOL! Yes they are the same ebay ID on both transactions, so I'm 100% sure.

Before the edit, you asked if I was accusing you of something nefarious. Let's just say this kind of crap makes me very skeptical.

That would make me skeptical as well, and I'd like to know now why piedmont sold this to me and bought it right back as well. I edited out "nefarious" because I wasn't sure the connotation applied. Any moderator could show you my PMs for the transaction...it was a pretty simple "he named the price, I paid it" sort of transaction. Piedmont150 hopefully can clear up all of this with an explanation. I'm just an innocent bystander who apparently is being railroaded into being a bad guy...

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by JP

Any moderator could show you my PMs for the transaction...

Nope. PM's are truly private...no one can see them except for you and the person who sent/received them.

[JP]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

Nope. PM's are truly private...no one can see them except for you and the person who sent/received them.

Oh well, o.k., so somebody I didn't know sold me a card on here and then bought it back for a higher price, after losing a bunch of money selling it to me in the first place. So what can you guys be accusing him of doing? And furthermore, since I have no control over who wins my eBay auction, how on earth can I be a considered a party in this?


EDIT: I just went back through all of piedmont150s posts, and it seems like he was selling cards at the time to fund a project. So maybe he begrudgingly sold at a loss to me, and then after a few weeks went by, had the funds to buy back his card from me when he saw it on eBay, for as little as $5 more than what he sold it to me. I don't see anything wrong with this...so hopefully the issue is dead. If he did have some sort of evil plan behind this, and I was unwittingly helping, whatever it was didn't work. So hopefully we can leave this issue, and speculation as to what his reasons were for selling, alone.

[Rob D.]

Thank you for this thread, David.

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

Thank you for this thread, David.

Edited to add: I concur. This is the best thread since Dorskind threatened to sue himself!

[Jim VB]

By the way, I refuse to believe anything written in this thread (including my own posts) until Richard comes on here and confirms them to be true!

No hunches! I want facts!

[OldSchoolBaseball]

Let me first say "Buying to sell and make some quick cash" is totally fine with me. I am sure I have purchased hundreds of cards that were profitable for the seller. That's fine with me.

I question the authenticity of some of these auctions and how they reach their final sale price. It sounds and looks fishy to me and other Net54 members.

[JP]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

This is the best thread since Dorskind threatened to sue himself!

Is that why he only talks in the 3rd person?

I remember on the old Net54 boards people used to give him a hard time about his silly "we" posts and usage of words like hither and henceforth. But people don't tease him in the new boards, why not?

[barrysloate]

Bruce speaks in the first person plural, for a reason that nobody can fathom. And he gets his fair share of ribbing on this board, and is not ashamed to give it right back.

[Rob D.]

JP,

I'll echo what others have posted: I don't need any PMs from you. If you've got something to say, post it here.

[JP]

Originally Posted by Rob D.

JP,

I'll echo what others have posted: I don't need any PMs from you. If you've got something to say, post it here.

The sale was legit.


EDIT: shoot...I should've PM'ed you that, would have been much funnier....

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by JP

EDIT: shoot...I should've PM'ed you that, would have been much funnier....

Instead of sending PMs to people you don't know, you might want to keep shoveling in an attempt to remove yourself from the hole you've put yourself in.