Modifications to Vintage Baseball Card Sets' Year(s) of Issue

[rhettyeakley]

I don't have any T213-3's anymore but I don't remember them being thick stock like the T213-2's. I wasn't implying they were as thin as T213-1's (those are REALLY thin) but I was comparing them to the T213-2, T214, and T215-2 cards. Again, I may be wrong but I don't remember them being the thickness of the glossy T213-2 set.
-Rhett

[Brian-Chidester]

Rhett,

With regards to the T215-1 Pirate backs (or whatever label you choose to give to this series), I know very little about them. I've never seen one in person and very few online scans.

The only reason I know anything at all about the T213 series is because I own one card from the first series and one from the second: a beater Miller Huggins (series 1) and an Otto Knabe (series 2), both of which have paper loss on the back, with the Huggins being heavily creased up. I bought these back around 1988 and had no idea for YEARS that they WEREN'T part of the T206 series. The blue type on the Knabe made me curious, but I kept them as part of my T206 collection nevertheless, and still do with the Huggins (he being one of only three HOF'ers that I had as a kid, all beaters, all with paper loss: Collins and McGraw-finger-pointing being the others).

I'd love to run across a beater T215-1 or Pirate Cigarettes for what I paid for my T213s back in 1988, but the chances in this day and age, with the internet and all, are slim and none.

[Leon]

Originally Posted by rhettyeakley

I don't have any T213-3's anymore but I don't remember them being thick stock like the T213-2's. I wasn't implying they were as thin as T213-1's (those are REALLY thin) but I was comparing them to the T213-2, T214, and T215-2 cards. Again, I may be wrong but I don't remember them being the thickness of the glossy T213-2 set.
-Rhett

I do own some of each. The -3's are the thickest of the bunch from what I remember (I am not holding one now). They are in fact thicker than the -2's and worlds thicker than the -1's. regards