![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is an example of a Koesters Bread exclusive card (w/ factory cut)...
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am guessing that many other e-bayers shared my doubts when making bidding decisions on these Koester Bread cards last night as the Ross Youngs sold for $70.99. Although it was hand-cut unevenly, the card still lists in the 2010 SCBC for $1,500, $900, $500 (these figures are approximate as I don't have the book handy) in varying conditions. I would think with this set being so scarce that a HOF'er would sell for far more than it did. I might have paid 4X the selling price if I knew the card to be legitimate.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan:
It sounds like you put in the time and effort that I was too lazy to do and you were rewarded nicely for it! My guess is that as long as you are able to provide documentation of the Lew Lipset auction showing the cards cut from a sheet to SGC, they will probably encapsulate any/all of the cards from last night's auctions as "Authentic" only as they were all hand cut. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I actually have a major problem with the grading companies encapsulating anything as a Koesters Bread card that isn't one of the exclusive cards I wrote about earlier.
While these cards were all likely Koesters as they obviously came from the same sheet/find. The problem lies in that every W575-1 of Dave Bancroft leaping in the air could then be deemed to be a Koesters Bread card and then be "worth" multiples over what it should. Even though these have the provenance as being Koesters (in my opinion) they are all just W575-1 UNLESS the player was only made by the Koesters Company-- Provenance can be tricky, I can already see people buying up any and all Yankee & Giants W575-1 cards and sending them to the same grading companies and having them all encapsulated as Koesters. I don't really care whether the card was made by Koesters or not, if one can't tell by looking at it on it's own merits it shouldn't be encapsulated as such. -Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Rhett, can you verify that all of the w575-1s carry the exact same caption as Koester's except for what you call the exclusive cards, i.e. typeset and text are identical?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Todd, there are actually a few that have some slight variations but I am not ready to out these yet as I need to do more research to confirm my theory. That being said, the VAST majority (roughly 75%) of "Koester's" cards are simply W575-1 cards--one would not be able to tell one from the other (thus in my opinion they are the same thing).
-Rhett I just wanted to add: To me it would be analogous to making a distinction between a regular Tom Barker game card a card that came out of the Fenway Brewery set. The only cards in the Fenway Brewery set that are any different are the Baker and the Scorecard/Instructions have had the red overprints on them. Any cards other than Baker and the Scorecard by themselves one would never be able to tell which "set" they originated from--thus they are the same thing (at least in my eyes).
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 Last edited by rhettyeakley; 02-16-2010 at 03:33 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a thought. Given the way printing was done then, It's unlikely the cards from a koesters sheet are exactly identical to W575s having come from a different printing plate. The key being "exactly". It's probable that there are tiny differences in the screening or dot pattern between the two sets. Inconsequential differences for most purposes, but still different enough to tell. If I owned any I'd do some 800 dpi scans and then I'd know for sure.
Steve |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Steve, I have 2 Koester's cards (Burkett and Youngs) coming. I'd be willing to scan them at 800dpi and send you the images. However, I don't own any 575's. Maybe someone else could do the same? Dan
Last edited by DanP; 02-18-2010 at 07:13 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is more likely that the same company that printed the W575 cards also printed the cards to be distributed by Koesters so the same screens, stock, ink and images were almost certainly used. There could be some differences in the printing, but it is likely that unless new poses or positions were used, the cards are probably as identical as other cards from the series with identical fronts and just different backs.
Rhett is the walking encyclopedia on this stuff and his knowledge on these sets is really unbelievable (especially since it is ALL from memory and he does not use Price Guides or other peoples research and catalogs) so I am not speaking for him. That is just my understanding on how these cards were made. Rhys |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Koesters Bread......similar to E121 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-18-2007 06:56 PM |
D327 Holsum Bread Cards + The Timing Of The Black Sox Scandal | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 12-26-2006 04:40 AM |
koesters bread card or kerr's candy card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-13-2006 11:46 AM |
Koester's Bread Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-06-2005 01:30 PM |
E121s & Bread, Candy Cards | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-26-2005 11:57 AM |