![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mark--I agree with what you are saying about the write-up. This is not a problem with only Goodwin however; the hype is pervasive in almost every catalog. I'm simply saying that I just ignore the hype and look at the item. Could it have affected the bidding, maybe, but probably not much if at all.
The practice that annoys me the most is, when examining the rarity of vintage cards, auction houses quote how many have been graded by SGC and PSA. This is truely meaningless. Most of the great Old Judge collections, as an example, have very few of their cards graded. Being the highest graded Old Judge is being the big fish in a very small pond. The result that I thought was really crazy in the Goodwin auction last night was the N172 Galvin PSA5 going for $9,400. That is not a particularily scarce card and, even though not graded, there are certainly better copies out there. While I'm at it, another practice that gets to me is lot descriptions that seem to be judged on how many flowery phrases can be jammed in to each paragraph. A one sentence example from the upcoming Legendary Auction's description of the restore-reversed Wagner is shown below (not trying to pick on Legendary--I could have found examples in virtually any current catalog): "A conservator’s earnest attempt to bring back the card’s signs of aging resulted in the sight one sees, today, when viewing it. " |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay- if I graded that sentence with my English teacher's cap on, I would request a rewrite. For some reason they feel convoluted sentences enhance a piece's importance.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jay -
The other thing I wanted to know - is that Recreation Park? I have no reference (I don't think) to compare. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
http://wapedia.mobi/en/1884_Philadelphia_Quakers_season
Interesting that cabinet is from a Cleveland photographer. Perhaps Cleveland was in town for the game and he tagged along. Wonder if there once existed a complementary Cleveland team shot. BTW, this site's image is the second Cleveland cabinet(like the unique one in Goodwin) Last edited by oldjudge; 02-12-2010 at 01:35 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
While trying to identify the players in the photo (I'm really bad at this and any help would be appreciated) I noticed that between eighth and ninth players, in the background, stands a suited Harry Wright (I'm pretty sure).
BTW, I'm not sure that the player identification in the write-up is entirely correct. While I think the third player is Coleman and the sixth is Andrews, I don't, for example, think the first is Mulvey. Vintage Philadelphia experts on the board--what do you think? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You know, that very well could be Harry Wright. If you take a loupe to it I'm sure you will easily find out.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
IMO - at the level of facial detail as published by the auction house - you can't be too sure of anything.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Likely to Flourish...Then become best company on the planet? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 02-21-2009 08:37 AM |