|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The grade drops:
http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...100&category=1 "Disclosure: It must be clarified that, although past restoration has been largely reversed, as described, under no circumstances would a qualified grading service or knowledgeable collector ever deem this card to be anything but a restored or altered example. In no way does our description intend to imply that this collectible should be regarded as anything but an authentic "altered" card." Last edited by Matt; 02-10-2010 at 11:51 AM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gee, I thought that Doug didn't know what the grade would be? Sure sounds like it was an "Authentic" all the way through. Sure took a long time to figure out that 'grade.'
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm not directing this at Legendary.... because I am guessing this was an owner's/consignor's decision....
But - why alter a card, for a second time, to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time? Altering a card to get it to 'look' like it did before it was altered..... seems ironic.
__________________
Joe D. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Even tough they are tough cards, it seems wierd that the first 4 lots in the auction are all altered in some way.
Just my opinion. Tony |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe all came from the same consignor?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This may be my favorite sentence of the year. From the item description:
"....decades’-worth of private handling – doubtless incurred during the fulfillment of the card’s role as a prized family heirloom – took a natural toll on sharply cut edges and deeply inked surfaces." |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Throw in some flowery language and it might bump 50K.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd guess it was done to try and get it into a numbered holder.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some fraudsters are well-known for buying altered cards (or suspect memorabilia) at reduced prices with the hope that either a grader or the next sucker who buys it will believe it to be un-altered.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can any card that was once restored, with honest disclosure, make it into a numbered holder once the restoration was removed? I wonder what the policy of the grading companies is on that.
__________________
Joe D. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
So if I understand correctly,they sent the altered/restored Wagner in to have the restoration work reversed,hoping the card would get at least some type of numerical grade,and when they sent it back in to be reviewed,it came back with the big "A" once again-please correct me if I got that wrong.
Wouldn't some collectors still want this Wagner-since it may cost less to obtain,fill the nearly "unfillable" spot in their collection,and at least know it is an "authentic" card? I do not desire cards from the T206 set that are deemed authentic,but I may bend on this one
Last edited by teetwoohsix; 02-10-2010 at 12:20 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wondering about duplicate Honus Wagner Tobacco Card Value | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-03-2019 06:11 AM |
| Recent passing of a relative of Honus Wagner! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-14-2011 11:43 PM |
| SOLD - 1906 Fan Craze NL - Honus Wagner HOF (PSA 7) | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 08-31-2007 02:17 PM |
| You are 3 Degrees from Honus Wagner ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-17-2007 08:20 PM |
| Unanswered questions concerning the proper dating of the T206 Honus Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-20-2003 07:09 AM |