![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quan,
If you were going with the slipery slope idea, I get it. I have mixed feelings about soaking and I think it just depends on the card/problem, but in this case I am more worried about the further damage the tape will do verse the damage soaking might do. This is not an issue of "take off the tape to increase the value or condition", it is "take off the tape to preserve the card". Anyway it seems the tape answer is to not soak. Matt, Thanks for the article, as for the rare cards I knew the 12-15 were the "rare" short prints just wondering if any were rarer or sold for more then the others. James g
__________________
WTB Boston Store Cards esp Ruth, Hornsby and 1915/16 UNC Strip cards and other Boston Store's too. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not among those that are outraged at the idea of soaking a card.... seems to me that many T cards were soaked out of scrapbooks, a generation or two ago... and many are in collections today, in the hands of those outraged at the idea of soaking. I'm ok with it. Casually ok.
HOWEVER, don't go trying to soak a T222 Fatima, or a T200 for that matter. You'll find yourself with nothing. I'd think that a restoration or archival person could get that tape off for you. But T222s don't soak. T206s do, Goudeys do... E90-1s do, and it has been going on since before most of us were born. The card of John Henry is probably the most difficult to locate. Last edited by FrankWakefield; 01-23-2010 at 09:24 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
dear james,
are you planning to keep the card for the next 10-15 years? is it a valuable card like a johnson/grover or a super SP that needs preservation urgently? i'd be more inclined to worry about fading on an OJ than a stain on a T222, but i haven't seen a photo of the t222 problem so maybe i don't know the severity. i don't soak...my position has always been i don't care if others do it, it's not the worst thing to do to a card. if you're honest just lmk when you sell me the card so i can make a choice to buy or not. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://www.thetoyheaven.com/images/i...ds/bbct222.jpg The card is not ripped in half and if there is a rip at all it is about an inch long. James G
__________________
WTB Boston Store Cards esp Ruth, Hornsby and 1915/16 UNC Strip cards and other Boston Store's too. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James,
i have the Lapp with the fabulous giant catcher's mitt. i think you meant to say Lloyd rather than Lapp in your last reference. best, barry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have 3 that have paper on the back, but soaking them seems too risky. There are a bunch in PSA holders that went through that process and they look faded and discolored, but it may be possible.
The toughest cards, from what I've seen, are Henry, Lelivelt, Johnson, L.Magee, Lobert and Schulte. The other 10 short prints are not quite as difficult. Bill |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi James,
I bought a T200 Fatima and was disappointed to find a piece of clear tape stuck on the back. After getting some advice, I heated up the tape with a hair dryer and peeled it off, with no damage to the card! The heat helps loosen up the sticky stuff. In your case, the tape looks very old, and it is sure to leave a stain but hopefully the tape will come off. Ron |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(28) T222 Fatimas SGC graded - HOF'ers; SP's; Marquard, Chance, Lee Magee | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 2 | 04-10-2009 09:23 PM |
T222 Fatimas needed | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 10 | 09-06-2008 08:48 PM |
The Hunt of the T222 Fatimas.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 08-09-2008 10:23 PM |
T222 Fatimas needed | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-07-2008 06:22 AM |
t222 fatima's wanted! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-29-2007 09:43 PM |