![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand your disappointment,Scott.
IMHO the card should receive no higher than a Good. The staining and paper loss should not be that noticeable on a 700 dollar T3. I hope that you get your money back. best, barry |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with the rest of the opinions here, talk to the seller and hopefully you can work something out.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am with Quan on this one. I don't think it's that bad. I am not a T3 collector but I have noticed grading companies be a bit lenient in grading of large sized cards. I would say it's only 1 grade difference, maybe a 3. If there was a big back scan, upon purchase, then I am not sure there is a lot of room for disgruntlement, maybe a little bit, but not a lot. This is just my own opinion. Ya' gotta do what makes ya' happy.....BTW, I have a nice VG-EX E94 with spots of paper loss on the back, but the front is close to NRMT. ALSO, if I am not mistaking it actually looks like some of those spots of paper loss are not paper loss but extra paper on the card. Maybe some scrapbook paste residue? Those could probably easily be removed.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As long as a scan was available in the listing, I don't think the seller should issue a refund on a graded card unless it's been tampered with or the holder is damaged. If no scan (of the back) was offered, why wouldn't the buyer have requested one, especially with a high dollar item like that? I ALWAYS request better or additional scans (if the originals are deficient in my opinion) before purchasing ANY card that costs more than $100 or so. Not a slam to the buyer in any way, but you have to be extra careful these days, especially with dealers you are unfamiliar with.
__________________
I Remember Now. ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the trick to getting great T3's is find PSA1's that look EX but have a small pin hole. If I were collecting them, I'd buy them all day like that.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know the first thing I do when I get a T3 is flip it over to see how great the checklist printing looks. What a raw deal. I'd agree that the mid-grade T3's are allowed more defects than a standard card.
Mac |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
they're not allowed more defects....you can't judge a defect from a 1.5"x2.75" and apply it to a 6"x8" card. don't know how i can make it any clearer.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
SGC grades similarly on T-3's. Here is a Matty of mine (BST pickup last year); the front is gorgeous, but the back has some paper loss issues. It grades an SGC 30. That much paper loss on a regular caramel card would not get close to a 30, but I think is appropriate for this card.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nice graded card boxes - advice....COMING SOON | jp1216 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 12-18-2012 03:28 PM |
Outstanding Graded Card storage case holds up to 150 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-12-2009 07:06 PM |
1951 Berk Ross Panels many highest graded SOLD | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 01-18-2008 06:41 PM |
Exhibits for sale some highest graded | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 09-20-2007 06:56 PM |
Graded and Non Graded M116's For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 8 | 12-22-2006 06:51 PM |