 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6
12-28-2009, 03:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
A cross-eyed mole is never a Hans
The artwork between the E91A, E91B and E91C sets was not changed, just the names. So any moles, crossed-eyes or other seeming variations are just the result of the quality of registration, printer's defect or the scan of the card. In my opinion the E91C Honus Wagner is Wagner in name only, unlike (for example) Christy Mathewson in the E91A set, which actually depicts Mathewson...do a search and locate the E91 article thread and you will get the full story of my theories on these sets.
Brian 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question Re: 1916 Standard Biscuit Hans Wagner ( 1 of 1 ?) Help ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-11-2008 06:03 PM |
| T-206 Wagner PSA Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-24-2007 09:28 AM |
| Hypothetical Question regarding Rare Wagner | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-13-2007 08:29 AM |
| e102 Wagner fielding question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 04-07-2007 11:15 AM |
| E91 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-19-2007 10:56 PM |
Threaded Mode