![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"...while a reverse pencil notation, which confirms the hurler’s identity, factors into the technical assessment."
Such a pencil notation should never be used to confirm identity, only provide further support for what had already been determined. Years ago in the Copeland sale at Sotheby's there was a purported cabinet of Henry Chadwick, an ID confirmed by his alleged autograph on the verso. The image bore as much resemble to Chadwick as this one does to Radbourn (i.e., highly dubious) and needless to say it was later shown to not be him. Absent further corroborating information not disclosed in the lot description, I think it was very irresponsible of Huggins & Scott to identify this image as being as being of Radbourn. And I think the low price is a reflection of the market's skeptism it is him. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crazy idea | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 07-24-2008 07:59 PM |
One idea, likely heavily flawed, for fixing some of the ills in our hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 01-11-2007 01:44 PM |
new idea for grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 12-12-2005 02:00 PM |
In the spirit of the comic book guy...BEST IDEA EVER | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-20-2005 08:56 PM |
T206 Doctored Card Detection Kit Ideas....anyone think this would be a good idea | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-29-2005 01:39 PM |