![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
yeah, you know, I already have two of those 5 (1967 raw and 1969 PSA 8), but I bought them anyway...couldn't resist the package deal.
The Mathews collection sounds great - do you collect graded or raw? targeting fairly high grade? Which one did you find the toughest to get a reasonable price on -of the ones you own?
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I only collect graded, with this "loosely" as my general rule... on anything pre-1972 the lower the grade, the better. on 72 to 79, looking for 7's, 8's and possibly 9's on 80 to 09, looking for 9's and possibly 10's For Mathews, i go for 5/6 maybe 7's Of the ones i own, they were all fairly reasonable. Havnt tracked down an affordable '53 bowman yet. its the '52 that wont be reasonable!!! LOL
__________________
Currently Working On: PSA Graded Post-War HOF Rookie Card Collection - 100%! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Eric,
that sounds like a good way to go about it. Most of my Mathews cards are raw, and I have been thinking about submitting them, but I suspect they are mostly 5s and 6s Ideally, I would like to assemble a graded collection with the 1960s cards in PSA 7 and the 1950s in PSA 6 if I can't swing the 7s... Just got the Banks lot yesterday...they look fantastic. Honestly, on a couple of them, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between those and a PSA 9. Good luck with your Mathews collection...post scans when you add a new one.
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think everyone makes some good points. Many post-war sets have very little price difference between 7's and 9's. I am working on an SGC graded 1970 Topps football set. I find that for the majority of the cards (mainly commons) there is little price difference between a 7 or 9, so I might as well go for the 9 and lead the way on the registry.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Funny you guys are talking about Mathews--I just got 2 back from SGC. The '54 Bowman is from my complete set and the '53 is from my #2 set. I sent a few of each in just to see how they would grade.
I also have a '53 Color just back, but I haven't looked at those yet!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for sharing...
You must have some extremely nice sets of these issues. I collect Mathews primarily because he was my Father's favorite player while growing up outside of Milwaukee. Do you have any player collections as well?
__________________
www.thetriple-l.com |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jason---
Never have been a player collector. The heart of my collection are the early'50s Topps & Bowman, and they are all my originals from my boyhood of buying packs. Several complete sets & dupes, altho I have sold most of the dupes over the last 8 yrs on EBay.
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How would you handle slab condition issues? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 04-28-2009 06:37 AM |
Solution to Slab Cracking Issues (With a Side Benefit) for SGC/PSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-29-2008 06:57 PM |
PSA - Why not slab miscut cards?!? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-10-2008 12:14 PM |
To slab or not to slab? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-18-2006 12:36 PM |
Toughest Slab to Crack | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-30-2003 07:11 AM |