T206 AMERICAN BEAUTY 460 sub-set survey....MISSION COMPLETE

[tedzan]

A Net54 reader has reported a CYoung (glove) with an AB 460 back.

Before I add it to the list it, I will check it out.


TED Z

[drdduet]

Ted,

Great stuff, you certainly have pulled out the monster's teeth.

[4815162342]

Michel Camilo

[tedzan]

Therefore, if my above analysis is correct, we should expect to eventually find the following 5 cards with AMERICAN
BEAUTY 460 backs.....if we do not first find them with Red HINDU backs.

My experience shows that the AB 460 back is very underrated. It is much scarcer than most T206 collectors realize.
Further reinforcement of this fact is, that no AMERICAN BEAUTY (Factory 42) cigarette packs have been found.



.................................................. ..................Factory 42





350/460 series cards........

Dougherty (arm in air)
McIntyre (Brooklyn & Chi)
Murphy (bat)
Overall (yellow sky)
Reulbach (no glove)


These 5 could possibly be No Prints. On the other hand, perhaps someone on Net54 (or a reader of Net54) may just
surprise us by reporting any one of these 5 with an AB 460 back ?

Thanks every one for your efforts in these type of surveys.


TED Z

[ethicsprof]

I checked my AB pack and it's fact.25 not 42---just throwin' a li'l late night
corroboration your way.
By the way, i do like ole Doc Duet's language of your 'pulling the monster's teeth'.

all the best,
barry

[tedzan]

Indeed, Darren is a cool dude regarding all aspects of "The Monster".

He's the guy who convinced me some years ago that the 1910 COUPON cards are indeed T206's.
Thanks Darren.


Regards ole buddy,

TED Z

[ethicsprof]

i'm not surprised! those Louisiana fellas know their cards and certainly had quite a few unique types come out of that one state!

alll the best to you, ole buddy

barry

[Leon]

Originally Posted by tedzan

Indeed, Darren is a cool dude regarding all aspects of "The Monster".

He's the guy who convinced me some years ago that the 1910 COUPON cards are indeed T206's.
Thanks Darren.


Regards ole buddy,

TED Z

I too could be convinced if they were at least on the same kind of paper stock, which they aren't. They are 100% different than ANY other T206 stock. That, combined with Burdick's designation, is proof enough (for me) that T213-1 should never ever be considered a T206.....but this is a debate that will go on for a long time...All in fun...best regards