|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just had this framed, I'm really happy with the way it came out.
![]()
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ted,
How did you arrive at 1953 as the date of the Mantle page? I have to disagree--in your favor, judging by signature style, that sig dates to no later than 1952. This style was employed by Mantle during his first two MLB seasons. Last edited by BillyCoxDodgers3B; 10-27-2009 at 01:03 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by 3and2; 10-27-2009 at 07:18 PM. Reason: add information |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Jodi, The 1953 date is what I was told by the dealer whom sold it to me. He said he was not 100% sure, he was going by the other autographs in the same album. Thank you for pointing out the correct years, I never would have known otherwise. Steve |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve,
If possible, perhaps you can ask that dealer if he owned/owns the rest of the autograph book that the Mantle came out of. The other players who signed the book might be better able to pinpoint the year. After all, a rookie-year Mantle is a much nicer acquisition than a 1952! Mick changed his signing style 5-6 times during the 1950's alone! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wish I could go back and ask him about the rest. But I picked it up at the White Plains show back in August when my wife and I were on vacation in NYC.
He had a large collection of albums he had bought and was selling the autographs off piece by piece. I know he had cut out quite a few of the autograph pages and had them for sale at the show. I had no idea that Mantle changed his autograph so much. I know the more common one and I had seen one other similar to this on Antiques Road Show. Is there any way to tell that would lean this to 1951 instead of 1952 without having the rest of the album? I really appreciate you sharing your knowledge with me. This is actually very exciting thinking I may possibly have a rookie Mantle autograph! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is no way to differentiate without gathering more information, so I guess it will always remain a "circa 1951-52" example. Some people do not like using the "circa" qualifier, but there's really no other option in the case of this piece.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Philly (Ft. Washington/Reading) show | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-03-2009 10:52 AM |
| WSSCA card show Nov 8-9 in Seattle, WA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 11-12-2008 05:07 PM |
| End of a Great Era....tell us of your PHILLY SHOW experiences ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 10-05-2008 11:04 PM |
| San Francisco Bay Area Sports Collectors Show June 28 | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 06-21-2008 04:09 PM |
| National Card Show in June: Questions ... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-15-2002 11:44 PM |