![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() Last edited by D. Broughman; 12-23-2009 at 02:37 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is probably more like 1/16th of an inch larger in either direction. Not is a much of a contrast as the Keeler you posted (maybe half-way in between or less - just enough so it won't fit in the holders - though in the SGC holder - it fits width wise.)
I will get a pic up.... The border are "plump" like a lot of the Doyle, J (AL) cards I have seen. It wasn't hand cut. Thanks. It is the "plump" white border that makes it bigger, the colored image is exactly the same size as my other cards. Last edited by green rhino123; 10-15-2009 at 02:24 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
T206's larger than the standard 2 and 5/8 inches x 1 and 7/16 inches certainly do exist. They're not particularly uncommon. Fewer drastic examples exist today than there were 20-30 years ago, because some enterprising scam artists realized that if they bought a jumbo T206 in VG condition with soft corners, they could transformer the card from VG to NM condition by trimming the card down.
A board member, I forget who, did an exhaustive study of T206 sizes maybe a year or two back and published his results here. Edited to add: I found one such study and linked it below. I think others may have done a similar survey. http://www.network54.com/Forum/15365...359/T206+sizes p.s. And yes, for anyone on the board who is new to T206's, the Keeler pictured above is a reprint. Last edited by Anthony S.; 10-15-2009 at 02:47 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Anthony S. The Keeler has a glossy finish. D.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Burns is one of those T206s (for whatever reason) that seems to occur from time to time with oversized dimensions. Here are two I used to own.
Piedmont backed ![]() Old Mill backed ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Something's not right with that Keeler (or not right with the settings on your scanner.) The print at the bottom of the card looks blue (should be brown) and the Polar Bear back also looks bluish. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My Burns also has an Old Mill back and it seems that a high % of Burns cards has the Old Mill back.
There are still a large number of oversized t206s but quite a few less than 20 years ago. Burns glove is borrowed from a team member because he lost his in a bet... ![]() The Keeler is a reprint.
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Has anyone seen the original photo this Burns card was designed from?
Id love to the see it. Its a funny card ![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So this is what I mean. "Plump" borders but the image is the exact same size.
Must be what has already been addressed... And this Burns card is curved a little, while the two side-by-side lay flat (just emphasizing the difference in size. Bad pic - but one can see the ink. It isn't dully smudged, more stamped on there. Maybe someone pen exploded on it years ago, but I think it is from the jersey or another card. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A dead giveaway that a T206 is a reprint is when it's missing the Factory # on the back, as that Polar Bear is.
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a Jake Stahl/Glove Shows that is a jumbo. Could these cards be
corner cards of the sheet perhaps?
__________________
"Stay thirsty my friends" ------------ Frank Betti |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I picked this up today at a card show. This card is quite a bit longer than most T206s I've seen, but what caught my eye was the line on the back in the upper right corner.
Jantz Last edited by Jantz; 01-16-2010 at 11:58 AM. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, Jantz, for posting that. I don't recall seeing such a line before. Seems likely that the card was at the top edge and just didn't get a final trim...
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Frank - I have never seen a line like this either on a t206 back and that is why I grabbed it at the show. I thought it was interesting.
Jantz Last edited by Jantz; 10-18-2009 at 05:59 PM. Reason: added more |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 "350-460" Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-26-2007 04:45 PM |
A T206 printing question for Bill Heitman, or anyone ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 03-06-2007 02:52 PM |
T206 Howie Camnitz PSA 10 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-11-2005 07:39 PM |
T206 Beckley sale question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-04-2004 04:42 PM |
T206 Ty Cobb Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-09-2002 12:21 PM |