![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We continued our discussion off-Net54 via your 3 emails and my 3 email replies to you. They all pertained
to statistical data regarding T206 mid series cards. Prior to and after these emails we exchanged info posts on this thread....they can be read in the following posts...... Matt...... #8, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 25, 29 Ted....... #13, 19, 24, 26 As is evident in these posts, there is nothing but meaningful exchanges of information regarding T206 cards conveyed in these exchanges between Matt and I. So, all this conjured up crap by the likes of Jim VB, that started in his #48 post here, is imagined sheer B##S. Simply, intended to instigate disruption in an otherwise very interesting and informative thread. This is just the latest in a continuing game Rob D and Jim VB have played in recent years on selected threads on Net54. TED Z |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"As is evident in these posts, there is nothing but meaningful exchanges of information regarding T206 cards
conveyed in these exchanges between Matt and I." Yep. Civil discourse. Oh. You left out post #47 where you told Matt how wrong he was, how his thinking was blurred, and implied that he needed reading lessons. "So, all this conjured up crap by the likes of Jim VB, that started in his #48 post here, is imagined sheer B##S. Simply, intended to instigate disruption in an otherwise very interesting and informative thread." The thread got nasty at #47, not #48. I just got tired of the bully and called him on it in #48. "This is just the latest in a continuing game Rob D and Jim VB have played in recent years on selected threads on Net54. " Again, I don't think I do what you claim. This is the very reason, I usually avoid commenting in your threads. I've probably made 500+ posts on this new board. Very few are confrontational. And fewer still are directed toward you. Until this thread, I can't remember the last time we (you and I) had any discussion. The only threads I have regularly disrupted have been Bruce's. That one's personal. He sent me emails wishing for my death. If you don't like me, Ted, that's fine. I'll get over it. But in the mean time, please stop lying about me. Anxiously awaiting your retraction and/or apology. In the meantime, I'm going to bed. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
this board can be great and is most of the time but I guess once in a while these threads turn from great information into throwing darts.
gas and tolls to Philly-$50 hotel for 2 nights- $215 my half of the table for 3 days- $350 hanging out with Ted and talking cards all weekend- priceless
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, we had a great time at the Valley Forge show last weekend. Although we didn't sell too much cardboard.
But, we sure had a lot fun "talkin baseball" (cards). You and I and Ron Oser. Then the Wonka man arrived on Sunday and we had a ball discussing 19th Century cards (BB & Non-Sports), and T206's, and 1947 BB and Movie Stars cards. Thanks, TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 10-02-2009 at 08:31 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The current thread...."New evidence of T206 expanded 350/460 series cards"....reveals the significance of the various shades of GREEN
colored backs found on the T206 SOVEREIGN cards. These color variations are not due to any random effects (i.e., fading, wear, etc.) Cards, whose backs are "candy apple green", accurately delineate the 350/460 subjects from the other series in the SOVEREIGN issue. The "forest green" colored backs clearly identify the 350-only series cards. Regarding the "candy apple green" cards......This 1st group of cards shown here with this shade of green backs are 5 subjects from the 350 series that American Lithographic (ALC) planned to extend into the 350/460 series. Two of them (Kleinow and Smith) were extended into the 460 series (reflecting their trades). The other 3 were not....since their major league careers ended prior to the 350/460 release in Summer/Fall of 1910. Joe Doyle........................traded to Cinci.(May 1910); career ends June 25, 1910 Red Kleinow (NY)..............traded to Boston May 1910 Simon Nicholls (bat)..........traded to Clev (spring 1910); career ends May 1910 Bob Rhoades (arm ext.)......career ends Summer of 1909 Frank Smith (white cap).....traded to Boston in the Summer of 1910. ![]() ![]() Some examples of "candy apple green" backs featuring HOFer's from the "350/460" series cards. ![]() ![]() ..............350-only back for comparison ![]() From this discovery, it can be concluded, with 100% certainty, that the O'Hara (NY); and therefore, its St Louis variation were strictly part of the 350-only series. The Demmitt (NY) does NOT exist with any SOVEREIGN back. Since the O'Hara (NY) & (St Louis) cards have been proven to be 350-only series cards by virtue of the color code of the SOVEREIGN backs......then it follows that the Demmitt (St Louis) is also a 350-only series card. As both of these St Louis variations were printed in the same POLAR BEAR press run. TED Z |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow Ted that's some digging, good job.
![]() Also it may be easy...but I have to say that's the first Sovreign backed O'Hara I think I've ever seen...how tough was that to find? Like I said could be easy but upon seeing it I started to think back and I dont think I remember one in my collecting days. Cheers, John |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks guy for your kind words; and especially, for sharing with us your amazing T206 find (Post #35), which included the rare Demmitt
and O'Hara cards. To your........ "Also it may be easy...but I have to say that's the first Sovreign backed O'Hara I think I've ever seen...how tough was that to find?" The O'Hara (NY) card exists with only 4 (or 5) T-brand backs. Of course the PIEDMONT 350 is easy to find. The SWEET CAP 350/30 is less seen....and, the CYCLE 350 is not often seen. The SOVEREIGN 350 is seldom seen. Also, a SWEET CAP 350/25 possibly exists, but I've never seen it. In the course of completing my all-SOVEREIGN set (407 cards), the Red Cobb with a 460 back was the very last card that I acquired. This O'Hara was one of the last cards on my wantlist. For a long time, I thought O'Hara was a No-Print......since, I already knew that Demmitt (NY) was a No-Print. FYI, there are 64 no-prints in the 350-only series of the SOVEREIGN set. Best regards ole buddy....and, hope to see you at the December Philly Show. TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 10-21-2009 at 08:07 AM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your O'Hara with the SOVEREIGN 350 back is only the 4th one that I have seen.
A really tough front/back combo. So, I'm not surprised that Wonka hasn't seen one. Best regards ole buddy. TED Z |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Demmitt St. Louis psa 1 for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-11-2008 09:03 PM |
T206 Demmitt St. Louis psa 1 for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 06-16-2008 11:42 AM |
T206 O'Hara and Demmitt St. Louis SOLD | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 03-20-2008 02:37 PM |
T206 Demmitt | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-19-2007 05:55 PM |
T206 Magie error and O'Hara, St. Louis, WANTED in poor condition | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 5 | 03-24-2007 04:40 PM |