![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think you are right about the prices. Judging by the interest on this board I think we have just experienced what happens when there are many more active buyers. A few key cards in Series 2 have seen prices seriously increase and I think Series 6 especially has gone through the roof. So all of you with a few T-210 cards laying around --get them to market now and cash in on the interest!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
TBob, if the one you saw near $100 was the card of the Norfolk Tars first baseman, Robert Chandler, then it was me that bid that card up... I think it would have sold for about $60 if I'd stayed out of it. But it had that great pose similar to Jack Dunn's vertical T206, so I bid him up a bit.
Still, I agree, T210s are selling for more these days. There's still some significant fluctuations, sometimes a card goes for way too much, other times it is almost stolen. T210 prices lack the stability of other old sets... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just checked the ol' spread sheet.
I put together my 12 Sav. players for an average of $31.54/card. ![]() ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's funny because so many people take a shot at the aesthetics of the set having black and white pictures and appearing "flat" and "dull." I wonder why this set has taken off like this?
Maybe if we can get a few of us to post about the beautiful aesthetics of the E91 and strip card sets, collectors will move toward those sets and leave the T210s alone ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Folks, these are erratic times, not to be confused with erotic.
Unless you need the card from that set very badly, don't be the one left holding the over priced bag. ..... ![]() |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with frank that card prices are subject to flux. I collect series 6 and I bought the Yancey on ebay last month for 75.00 dollars and it was psa 3.5 and I just purchased two other T210's from a board member that arrived today and it cost me 275.00 for the pair, or course they are in very good shape though. So that is a good example right there about the madness. The psa 3.5 should have went a lot higher in my opinion as the other two are ungraded.
tony |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Tony,
I was going to bid on that Yancey and was going to bid about $125 or so... Really Nice card - I was kicking myself for letting that slide by... I forget to bid about once a quarter, so I am good for missing 4 sweet cards a year. It drives me nuts, so I guess I should consider a snipe service, but I kinda snipe myself at the last second and enjoy it.
__________________
Collector of Nashville & Southern Memorabilia |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand that completely. I have done that several times myself where I see a card and think I just let it slide by and then you don't see another one for months. I was kicking myself for not bidding higher on 1915 cracker jack ed cicotte a few years back and now there is one on ebay again, maybe I won't let it slide this time and get into some real bidding on it. I usually just collect T210 series 6's but there was always something about that particular card I really liked.
Tony |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is the Microsoft Live Rebate skewing realized prices? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-01-2008 07:46 PM |
Need prices realized Geppi's Oct. 05' | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-23-2008 05:21 PM |
Top 20 most expensive cards ... realized prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-11-2007 11:51 AM |
How does one access old Mastro auctions and prices realized? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-29-2005 09:18 PM |
Prices Realized On One T206 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 39 | 02-02-2005 03:35 AM |