![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
What's your point? Certainly Hector Lopez wasn't a "lock", but Moose Skowron, Clete Boyer, Tom Tresh, and Bobby Richardson? They can just build a new wing if they run out of space. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In terms of stats, there are several ballplayers in the HOF with numbers that do not equal Henrich's stats (proportional
to years played). Mazeroski for starters...... .............yrs......AB........H.......HR........ BA......RBI.......R.......OBP......SLA Maz.........17....7755....2016....138..... .260......853.....769.... .299.... .367 Henrich....11.....4603....1297....181..... .282.....795......901... .382..... .492 NOTE....the significance of RBI's and RUN's in Henrich's stats vs Maz's stats. Henrich lost 4 yrs of playing time while in the Coast Guard (1942-46) Peter....did you see him play ? I did from 1947 - 1950....and this guy was a tremendous clutch hitter, one of the best. That's a factor that does not show up in the stats. He was in 5 World Series and he was a big factor in the Yankees winning all 5 of them. And hey, looky here....the Ohio/Texas "tandem dudes" have entered the fray ! By some twisted form of thinking....look for the appearance of a Jack Dunn card to be worked into this thread ? ? TED Z |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted to be sure I did not see him play. But that said, respectfully the fact that his stats on an adjusted basis (and I am not sure it is legitimate to make the adjustment, as the fact remains that he only played 11 years) are comparable to one of the truly weak HOFers does not support the argument, in my view. I just don't think there is even an argument that he should be in the Hall, although that does not mean he was not a very good ballplayer.
EDIT TO ADD Jack Dunn is definitely horizontal. ![]() Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-29-2009 at 11:02 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted do you support his election? 1530 hits, 253 HR, .268 BA, according to Baseball Reference most comparable to Jose Valentin and Bret Boone.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() Regards |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding why Joe Gordon was elected to the HOF is two-fold......
1) He was an All-Star 2nd baseman (same reason given for Maz's HOF selection) 2) Indeed, he was good enough to be in every All-Star game (9) in his career except his 1st year. Really, when the discussion comes up of who is in (or not) in the HOF. In my opinion, why Gil Hodges has been slighted is a big mystery to me. You like to compare stats (and his numbers are great); so, tell me why Hodges is not in ? ? TED Z |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted,
If you use the flawed logic that there are players in the Hall of Fame whose stats are just a little bit better than (insert player here), you'll eventually reach a point where every player is worthy of induction. Bill James has done a great job of showing how flawed the "Well this player's in, so then this player deserves to be in, too" argument is. As for the horizontal Dunn references, I think most people realize that my posts about the T206 Dunn being a horizontal pose were jabs at you and your continual snotty reactions to most folks when they dare to question anything you might post about the T206 issue. Sorry I couldn't be more clear. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Were the horizontal cards printed differently then the vertical cards?
Edited to say: Rob - did you mean snooty or snotty? Last edited by Matt; 09-29-2009 at 11:39 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted, given who is in the HOF I think a very good case can be made for Hodges, given the numbers he put up during the 1950s. His career stats come up a bit short, but if Jim Rice is in on the theory that he had an outstanding 10 years stretch, I think (without going back and checking) that Hodges qualifies on that basis too.
EDIT TO ADD Of course the same logic would say Steve Garvey should be in. On balance I would probably not have voted Rice in even though he played for Boston, and say no to Hodges and Garvey as well. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-29-2009 at 11:49 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This opinion of yours......
"I think most people realize that my posts about the T206 Dunn being a horizontal pose were jabs at you and your continual snotty reactions to most folks when they dare to question anything you might post about the T206 issue." .....is not shared by as "most" as you imagine. For many years, at the National, at the Philly Show, and many, many emails that I have received......have been very complimentary to me regarding my theories, posts, etc. regarding the T206's. Essentially, because I have informed them of certain aspects of the T206 set that they did not fully understand. But, if you think I'm a "snotty" dude, there's nothing I can say or do to change your impression of me. And..... frankly, I don't give a damn ! TED Z |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Ted,
Just saw your thread. Even if I hadn't known the answer, I knew you had to be talking about your Yankees. So a Cardinals question for you... In honor of one of their Hall of Fame pitchers, the Cardinals retired uniform #17. The question, who was the last Cardinal to wear #17 ? And the two great Cardinals who's first name was Francis... Frankie Frisch and Cardinal Francis Spellman. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL Ted. Seriously, the position of his glove does not make sense to me if you think the card is vertical. One does not catch a pop fly with the glove turned in towards one's face, rather, the glove would be turned away from the face. In my opinion. Also if you assume the card is vertical he is leaning back at a weird angle and must have the most supple neck in history.
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-29-2009 at 05:39 PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh so Dunn is making an over the shoulder grab on the run, I get it, now if only we could explain the strange angle at which he is leaning back and the rubber neck.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Craig....I was going to respond to Peter, but your pix of Willie Mays' great catch speaks louder
than any thing I could say. But, I'll ask this, anyhow. Hey Peter...... When you played BB in your youth (or now), what position did (or do) you play and how did you prepare to catch a sky-high fly ? Incidently, Jack Dunn played SS and 3rd base for most of his career. Therefore, you can bet that he had to catch many a sky-high fly and his T206 pose shows exactly how he did it. TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 09-29-2009 at 06:38 PM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ted at any position assuming I were not doing the Willie Mays over the shoulder thing and I was facing a ball coming AT me, my glove would be turned the other way. You don't catch a ball with the glove turned in. Would you? And note how if you look at it horizontally both his face and the glove are perfectly aligned with the orientation of the card. Coincidence?
Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 09-29-2009 at 08:17 PM. |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I may have lived in Ohio for 10 years, and Texas for the last 4, but I'm a born and raised New York guy. I am the type guy who has been a Yankee fan my whole life. I was ridiculing the post that suggests that Yankee fans aren't rational about who deserves the Hall of Fame. Sorry if that attempt at humor sailed right over your head. I'll try to keep it more lowbrow going forward. Last edited by Jim VB; 09-29-2009 at 01:53 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "17" question is for everyone...
Good try, Peter. But a famous member of the St. Louis Cardinals wore #17 after Dizzy did. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm still waiting for this guy to get in. A poll of the top pitchers in the AL of the 60's said this guy was the best hitter in baseball. His career was cut short by knee surgeries but he had a rifle for an arm, speed, and several silver bats in his closet.
1676 6879 6301 870 1917 329 48 220 947 86 55 448 645 .304 .353 .476 .830 |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tony O.
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Oliva I assume. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Cards got around to retiring #17 in 1974.
Where did you get such great uniform number information, oh Dinosaur??? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today's TRIVIA....Name 3 successive HOFers at a given position....and ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 07-19-2009 12:03 PM |
Tuesday Night Trivia AND Pitching Trivia COMBINED!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 07-30-2008 08:40 AM |
Tuesday Nite TRIVIA quiz....Part II ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-30-2008 08:19 AM |
Tuesday nite Trivia ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 05-13-2008 09:45 PM |
Tuesday Trivia....Who has been in more World Series ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 03-25-2008 05:43 PM |