![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It has been an interesting evolution w/r/t postwar cards. When slabbing started 8 seemed to be the magic number for postwar cards. 6s and 7s were still collectible and did OK but 8s were the cards people went nutty for. 9 and 10 were so hard to find that they demanded premiums but little attention. As the populations rose, though, the hype shifted over to 9s and 10s. 8s lost some of their heat and 7s had stagnated for quite some time before the Great Recession; 6s and below had fallen off the radar. I was picking up nice 6s and 7s at $5 each at the National over the last few years. Now you can barely get that for the cards of the 70s.
Personally, I decided long ago to stay away from the 8-9-10 area, primarily because I saw too little difference in eye appeal to justify the $$ premium. I downgraded my postwar 8s and 9s to 6s and 7s and used the extra bux to buy more cards. That hasn't changed for me, although over the last two years I have gradually shifted from buying graded cards at all to "dumpster diving" at major shows in bins of raw cards for nice raw cards of the postwar era. A lot easier to collect (physically, that is) and a heck of a lot cheaper too.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Commons? Yeah. I've got a few.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
great stuff, jim nice binders, are those all players from the set that has the card shown on the binder
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I understand your question correctly, the answer is yes. I selected one card from each set as an example. I scanned it (OK, in some cases I stole a scan from VCP. It was easier that way.) I printed out a full size 8 x 10 for the pouch on the front cover. I printed another sheet selecting 9 cards at a time printed on one page, cut them out, and attached them to the spines for the matching year. So what you see there are not real cards, but home printed pictures on a heavier card stock. (I think it's 110 lb. stock. It the thickest that will go through my printer without jamming.)
The binders are basic Avery Heavy Duty Display binders from Staples. Baseball gets black. Basketball gets blue. Non-sports gets white. Size varies by how many sheets I need. (Smaller binders had to get smaller pics, obviously.) Most cards are ungraded and in 9 pocket pages. Graded cards are in 4 pocket pages in the front of the binder. I'm still short about 40-50 cards from 1952, 1954, 1960 and 1961, but everything else is complete. I try to knock off at least one set each year. This year, I finally finished 1957. Last edited by Jim VB; 09-24-2009 at 10:00 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
nice, cool sets good luck on all of them
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boxing - Vintage Boxing Photos and Other Memorabilia Ending Tonight August 9, on Ebay | D. Bergin | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 1 | 08-09-2009 03:54 PM |
Vintage movie cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-14-2005 11:05 AM |
Beckett eliminating subgrades for Vintage (BVG) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-11-2005 12:34 PM |
What is the most valuable vintage sportscard collection worth | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 101 | 09-02-2005 06:57 AM |
OT - Nationals worth it for vintage non-baseball cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-17-2005 01:42 AM |