sfmays24 is a person of interest

[sfmays24]

nam812,

As I have already mentioned, I never received the additional scans (some 15-20 total), nor any cards. Now that this is a topic, I would very much like the proof that shows I received these scans or cards.

Mike

[lsutigers1973]

I sent a message to the CU forum user that has more information regarding the missing set. I sent him a link to this thread and asked that he explain the truth ONCE AGAIN that Mike is ignoring and trying to spin the truth.

[lsutigers1973]

Your response on another thread about 2 weeks ago:

There has only been 1 time that I paid for a group of cards and never received them... the seller sent them (I never question that) and they were either mis-delivered or lost? ...the tracking number indicated that the package was delivered at 10am that morning, but that was not the case since I was mowing my lawn and my mail arrived at 2pm (as always) without the package in my box.

This was supposedly a year ago but you happen to remember that you were mowing the yard at the specific time that the cards were supposedly delivered a year earlier?

BTW, once again there ARE 3 PEOPLE that have responded to this thread that say the about statement is a lie after you failed to receive cards from them or them from you. None of the 3 people that responded are even the 1 you were referring to in the above statement.

[Matt]

So nice to see the lurkers posting more frequently.

[timzcardz]

Originally Posted by Matt

So nice to see the lurkers posting more frequently.

Now THAT right there is funny!

[Ladder7]

Originally Posted by Matt

So nice to see the lurkers posting more frequently.

Heh, For sure, there's a moral to that story somewhere.


On a related topic, I can't for the life of me remember how to pronounce Lajoie

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by Ladder7

Heh, For sure, there's a moral to that story somewhere.


On a related topic, I can't for the life of me remember how to pronounce Lajoie

I used to go with - "Lah-joy", but Rob D insists it is - "Lah-zo-way." I defer to him on this matter.


Thanks Steve!

[justmike]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

I used to go with - "Lah-joy", but Rob D insists it is - "Lah-zo-way." I defer to him on this matter.


Thanks Steve!

Interestingly enough I adistant relative of Lajoie,My family now spells it Lajoy.

[scooter729]

What's the record for sub-off-topic topics within one off-topic thread? This has to be approaching record status here.

[Jim VB]

Why is it that a couple of times each year, this board gets invaded by escapees from the CU Forum? Invariably these guys are in a "huge" fight over something, have been banned or locked out of that board, and elect to continue it over here. It seems their issue is always over $25-$50, usually in shiny new cards.

Do these guys think we are incompetent? We have many posters on Net 54 who are perfectly capable of mucking up our own board! We don't need help from immigrants from other boards! There are many of us who can start a fight and continue one! We can play offense or defense! We already know the meaning of the word "disfunctional!"


What can we do to take our board back?


(Short of that, what can we do to discuss cards again?)

[justmike]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

Why is it that a couple of times each year, this board gets invaded by escapees from the CU Forum? Invariably these guys are in a "huge" fight over something, have been banned or locked out of that board, and elect to continue it over here. It seems their issue is always over $25-$50, usually in shiny new cards.

Do these guys think we are incompetent? We have many posters on Net 54 who are perfectly capable of mucking up our own board! We don't need help from immigrants from other boards! There are many of us who can start a fight and continue one! We can play offense or defense! We already know the meaning of the word "disfunctional!"


What can we do to take our board back?


(Short of that, what can we do to discuss cards again?)

I understand what you are saying but we were warning the fellow collectors here about this guy in question.I for one don't want to see anyone get ripped off.I was kind of hoping you guys would send Marshall our way as payback.I thought he was a riot but no such luck.
Mike

[Jim VB]

Originally Posted by justmike

I understand what you are saying but we were warning the fellow collectors here about this guy in question.I for one don't want to see anyone get ripped off.I was kind of hoping you guys would send Marshall our way as payback.I thought he was a riot but no such luck.
Mike

Perfectly understandable, but Leon warned people in post #1. By post #10 or so, we, pretty much, knew there were concerns. The last 100 posts (including mine) are all off topic or overkill.

This is a VINTAGE BASEBALL CARD BOARD. Please point me to concerns which are about that subject.


Edited to add:
Will you take Marshall and Bruce?

[Rob D.]

Originally Posted by Jim VB

We have many posters on Net 54 who are perfectly capable of mucking up our own board! ... There are many of us who can start a fight and continue one!

Did somebody call me?

[bh3443]

Hi,
nam, is that you that has the truly gorgeous 218 registered set?
I love those cards and was just wanting to say congratulations on a suberb set, if that's you!
All my best,
Bill Hedin

[justmike]

Originally Posted by bh3443

Hi,
nam, is that you that has the truly gorgeous 218 registered set?
I love those cards and was just wanting to say congratulations on a suberb set, if that's you!
All my best,
Bill Hedin

Nick those sound like fighting words.

[Leon]

It's my fault this thread started at all. The reason I started it was obvious. There was someone on our BST that seemed to have some issues, real or not, following him. I feel it is my/the moderators responsibility for alerting other Net54baseball.com members. I mistakenly thought it was someone else with a very close USER ID to the one in question. That was my mistake and for that I am sorry and apologize. As for this thread.....I am not sorry I started it as it needed to be talked about since there were things on our BST that it pertained to ie...the people involved. Regards

[nam812]

Originally Posted by bh3443

Hi,
nam, is that you that has the truly gorgeous 218 registered set?
I love those cards and was just wanting to say congratulations on a suberb set, if that's you!
All my best,
Bill Hedin

Yes Bill that is me, and thank you very much for your kind words.

Regards, Nick

[BCauley]

I don't post often at all as is apparent by my post count and I lurk a lot. I've picked up a few cards on the B/S/T and sold some T206's a couple of years back. I love to read and learn on these boards and as a result, I've been able to take that information and help out other people on a couple of other boards I go onto once in awhile. I have read this thread and by the end wanted to pull my hair out as it got to the point that it just made no sense anymore. Quite a few people have already stated now that this needs to go private so there really is no need to have another person come to join this mess.

Anyway, that's a lurkers two cents so take it for what you will.

Originally Posted by lsutigers1973

I sent a message to the CU forum user that has more information regarding the missing set. I sent him a link to this thread and asked that he explain the truth ONCE AGAIN that Mike is ignoring and trying to spin the truth.

[barrysloate]

I agree with Jim, and Jeff earlier: this argument does not belong on the vintage board, and should be moved to the post war section or deep sixed. There are participants on this thread who are virtually new here, and shouldn't be allowed to conduct this kind of nonsense.

This thread should be locked.

[ALR-bishop]

Originally Posted by sfmays24

nam812,

As I have already mentioned, I never received the additional scans (some 15-20 total), nor any cards. Now that this is a topic, I would very much like the proof that shows I received these scans or cards.

Mike

Several years back after a discussion about the Topps 1969 4 in 1 stickers on CU I got a pm from Mike asking if I had an extra Mays. I did, but told him that it was part of a extra set I had and did not want to sell just the Mays. He expressed some interest in the set but wanted to see scans. I do not scan worth a darn.

I had successfully bought a high dollar item from Mike previously ( involving 1967 Topps Punch Outs), so I felt ok sending him the set for his review with the understanding he would pay a price, as I recall $ 250 ( because some stickers had loose backing ), or send them back. He says he never recieved them. Maybe he didn't. I let it go. Worse things happen in life. But, when this topic, "sent but not recieved", popped up on CU recently, I just posted that I had already learned my lesson here.

And, no, I can no longer "prove" anything. Nor do I care anymore. The end.

I post as bishop on CU. I post here, but in the post war pre 80 section