 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
09-13-2009, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Master Sets
Doug---I think a lot of people feel just as you do. But, for example, what about the 1962 set in which there are 4 different cards numbered 137: two completely different poses of Reniff ( potrait and pitching) and two variations of a Ruth pose. Admitedly that situation is rare ( although it happens a couple of other times in the same 62 set), but in the 59 set Topps made deliberate changes to about a half dozen cards in latter print runs, and that is true in a number of other sets as well. Even if you exclude print error variations, what do you do about intentional Topps changes ? And then where is line drawn on what is a "variation" and what is a "print defect". It is beyond me. But I do like collectiong proofs, errors and variations anyway
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-13-2009 at 03:44 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LARGE List of Autographed Cards For Sale - 1940s through 2000s (All Sports) | canjond | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 06-13-2009 05:54 PM |
| WTT Vintage for Vintage (40'-60's) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 02-01-2009 04:31 PM |
| 1970-1980 baseball singles at good prices | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 04-11-2008 05:03 AM |
| 1952 Topps series 1 - 80 for sale | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-09-2007 09:06 PM |
| Vintage High-Grade Baseball Cards from the 1962 Topps Set on eBay | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-08-2006 03:04 PM |
Threaded Mode