![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ouch!
For the record, I don't believe PSA has a category below "?Auth." That's their way of saying it's a fake. SGC will just plain say "Counterfeit", but I don't think PSA will. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was watching that and just didn't make sense to give away a card like that so I didn't even bid. If real could've taken to a show and traded for some great stuff or sold it, and why not resubmit again. Of course it is possible that PSA originally made a mistake the first time and seller then realized it was probably a fake so just dumped it for as much as possible. My only issue is if it is a fake, someone just got the original slip so can easily reslab and sell as a 5 o/c and make a quick 700-1000 easy and rip someone off, not cool.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The card is a reprint. The bottom red strip should not match up perfectly at the ends (same exact width) as the blue background. Also the bat should extend more into the border at top. The overall color is way too dark compared to the too white borders. Look at the eyes and face.... way too dark!
#92 below ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thank you Frank! Your wisdom is unmeasurable.
Lovely Day... |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Leaving authenticity aside the original grade makes no sense that is not o/c for a 5. And look at the back, the bleed appears to me to be right against one edge whereas it is not on the front.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the seller may have sat the reprint card on top of the PSA 5 sealed case and took the picture after he had already received the card back as a reprint. The steps people will go to to try and rip us off!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is wrong on so many levels I don't know where to start. He should be called on the carpet here for his deed. I am Calling for him to be banned from this site for doing this. We sure don't need people like him as a member.
What is his ID on this site? Last edited by Minerscoin; 09-04-2009 at 11:12 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The seller gave all the information. Read the complete description. So anyone bidding on the card is aware it is a crapshoot. Unfortunately it was probably graded earlier and the seller lost out by resubmitting the card. Like we always say bid on the card not the slab.
joe |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 U.S. Caramel Scarcity VS 1933 Goudey etc | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-20-2009 08:32 PM |
For Sale: 1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig # 160 SGC 86 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-03-2008 06:41 PM |
1933 Goudey #92 Gehrig Appears VG+ SOLD | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-23-2008 09:13 PM |
1933 Goudey Gehrig #92 Wanted | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2005 07:00 AM |
Wanted- 1933 Goudey Gehrig | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-11-2005 09:27 AM |