 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-29-2009, 12:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Brian- Old Cardboard really wasn't interested in it? That seems odd, as it sounds like a pretty good topic to me.
The N284 Buchners are likewise either generic or accurate. Identical poses are often used on different players, whereas some players can be identified without even looking at the name on the bottom. Last edited by barrysloate; 07-29-2009 at 12:29 PM. Reason: edited for spelling 
|
|
#2
07-29-2009, 02:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
E91 article
In all fairness to Lyman, about a year ago we talked over the phone about the article and it was his opinion that the images of the comparision cards needed to accompany the article. I was able to provide scans of all the E91A cards, but only own maybe one or two of the comparision cards (the sets in the book I utilized were T204, Fan Craze, PC Rose, and M116's--all sets I don't really collect). I think he would be more interested in the article if I had those images scanned, but what the hey, I don't. Also Lyman read the article and perhaps was just letting me down easy (otherwise known as my writing and research was lacking, or sucked wind). Perhaps when I have the time I could post here, and people could do their own research.
Brian
|
|
#3
07-29-2009, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe it just needed a little editing.
|
|
#4
07-30-2009, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank You, Rhett:
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
