SGC and the Grading Company Employee

[sb1]

I may be failing to see the big problem, as I trust the people grading the cards at SGC. I know every employee from Dave Forman on down and I believe that each card they grade is done so on an unbiased basis. I and others I know personally have handed them 5 or 6 figure cards to grade and we go not favors nor disfavors. Each card was graded on the merits of the card and that alone, not whom owned it or consigned it. That being said, I have no problem with them owning a card owned by Dave, as i feel the same unbiased judgement was applied.

If the board members have as much confidence in SGC and their abilities as they have formerly portrayed why would you question the ethics of Derek and his grading team?

[oldjudge]

Scott--The issue is that an SGC employee and a recent SGC employee gave diametrically different answers as to whether the company would grade Foreman's cards. I think people are just looking for a straight story.

[sb1]

Jay I agree on that. Perhaps SGC will no be compelled to have a written policy on submitters and clear up the matter.

[oldjudge]

I wonder why there has been no clarification from SGC.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

I wonder why there has been no clarification from SGC.

At least give them a day to respond. They were already on here yesterday clearing up some things.

[tothrk]

Originally Posted by oldjudge

I wonder why there has been no clarification from SGC.

No time for clarifications when you're busy shredding damning evidence.

[T206Collector]

Originally Posted by sb1

If the board members have as much confidence in SGC and their abilities as they have formerly portrayed why would you question the ethics of Derek and his grading team?

For me it's about protecting the value of the cards from a collecting public that may not know or trust the grading team at SGC as well as many of us do.