![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just re measured it. Measured just the glass this time. 22.5 X 14.5. I will take it out of the frame eventually. I do have it in hand and can't find a reference for it. I appreciate your comments and time.
Frank, You might be right. SCD might be off. Copyright is 1910. Must be a typo. I have received a few e-mails about this. Thank You Last edited by bigfish; 06-24-2009 at 09:31 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a large collection of baseball magazine supplements and would love to have this one. If you ever decide to sell it, let me know.
Doug doug.goodman@earthlink.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Doug,
In your estimation, that is an M113 Baseball Magazine, right? |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
One of my favorite photographic images issued by the Baseball
Magazine. Not sure if it`s a M113 issue. aL |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The item definitely has all the hallmarks of a M113 Baseball Mag Premium except the size. 1910 was the first year they produced the M113/M114's so they may not have had them standardized to what they were in later years. Although, there is tremendous variation in the sizes among the Baseball Mag Premiums. This one does appear to be that, but was specially made as a much larger piece.
-Rhett
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is a very desirable Burke & Atwell Supplement issued by The Baseball Magazine in 1910. These are scarce and are quite coveted by collectors.
Below is a link from a Hunt Auction in 2005, which is the only time they've featured an original one of these (it has been reproduced, so be careful). Please note the price realized, and the fact that this one was in rough condition with a repaired tear. It is tough to find them any better (if at all) but like any other panoramas, the condition and price are closely linked. http://www.huntauctions.com/LIVE/ima...=961&lot_qual= You could consider re-framing yours, to conceal much of the water staining along the edges. Although many collectors prefer the original frame, no matter the condition.... simply a matter of preferance. Below is a shot of mine. It's one of my favorite panoramas of all-time, and really captures the essence of the fabulous dead-ball era... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great info, Mark.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
Thank you so much. I appreciate all of the help. Thank You, Toby |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've not heard of a Burke & Atwell Supplement...
I still think it is an M113 from Baseball Magazine, notwithstanding what is opined above or by Hunt. I don't have faith in the 1913 SCD date, nor the 1910 date mentioned above. I understand that it has a copyright date of 1910 on it... seems to me that they may well have gone out the following year. Dating these is an odd process. Mr. Haber and others were of the opinion that some Baseball Magazine premiums that were listed in the ads weren't available when initially availabe; and that some weren't ever available even though they were advertised. Generally, SCD has done well with their list and their dating. As for Hunt's price, that seems realistic for one in good shape. Hunt mentions that their offering is marked Burke & Atwell, but they don't refer to it as a "Burke & Atwell Supplement". Hunt mentions dimensions of 12" x 20". I think this is an M113. |
![]() |
|
|