![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This story should go national. If someone wants to, do it here:
digg.com/submit From there, it will eventually hit all the local news networks. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If only O'Keefee hated T cards...
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd characterize my reading of the explanation as highly skeptical up until I got to the point about consigning to REA to "complete" the auction. What? That was the credibility-point-of-no-return for me.
I can see making them for fun to see if you can do it. I can also see showing them off online, to see if anyone catches on. I can even see getting them graded, again to see if the job is good enough to fool a professional looking at it in person specifically to identify additions and alterations. But the second you took or attempted to take a dime for one, all fun and challenge and testing of the system was off, and you became a common crook. Joann |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Joann he crossed the line LONG before that.
"What happen to the Hart? The Hart was the only one (other than Revelle) left my possession after being graded by PSA. About 7 yrs ago, my desperation on collecting t206s completely covered my sane and mind and traded out the Hart for some t206 oddities that I had never seen before." |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have not been on the site too much the last few weeks, but what a story - it really has been hard to trust anyone in the hobby with so many problems. I really hope things improve and these types of stories slow down.
Jimmy |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In the next paragraph, we have this grammatical gem.
" However, we have solid proves to support the Piedmont pack that offering here do enclose a tobacco card since the date it was manufactured." |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|