![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm trying to think about all the nuances of that plan but on first look I think it is an excellent one. The reason I like it is it forces a bidder to start bidding. Any system that allows a bidder to wait ten hours before he logs on is flawed.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's exactly the angle I've been looking at. There has to be pressure put on the participants to participate or the whole thing grinds along. At the same time having a definitive cut off doesn't help the early action either. So there has to be a system that encourages action and exhaust the potential bidders until only one is standing. Much like a live auction. What can be the on line equivalent of "Going once...going twice" It's not the fifteen minute rule as we know it now. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly - It effectively forces every bidder to place a potentially winning bid on at least one lot at a reasonable time. That should certainly help. The hole in this plan is when does the auction end - if I'm chasing multiple lots, I could be high on one all night and wait until 4 AM to place a bid on several others; but I'm working on an idea that should solve that issue.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Note that lots such as the T206 Wagner and the N172 lot of 592 never received a bid after 4:00 PM Saturday. In fact the Old Judges ended days before the close. The reason: it reached its maximum, it had nothing to do with a clock. So any system that speeds up the bidding process will have absolutely no negative effect on the final bid. It will get to where it belongs whether it is faster or slower.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK - after discussing with Tim in the chat - I think we've come up with something, which, dare I say, might solve all the issues raised in this thread regarding auction ending times. Please post here if you see a hole in the plan.
These times are all arbitrary - use a different number if it makes more sense to you: 1) As it does now, Extended Bidding begins at 4 PM and you may only bid after this point on lots you've bid on prior to this point. 2) At 10 PM, the auction ends (soft-ending). 3) After 10 PM, anyone outbid on any lot, will get a personal 20 minute window of Extended Bidding (and normal Extended Bidding rules apply - bid on anything you have a qualifier on) from the time they are outbid. Anyone outbid on a lot from 9:40-10 PM will have a 20 minute window starting at 10 PM. 4) The auction ends (hard-ending) when the last bidder with a 20 minute window open decides not to place a high bid on any lot. Why this works (I think): This has the advantage of a hard ending, like eBay, in that everyone will be compelled to place their high bids before 10 PM. No one can lay low waiting until 3 AM to bid, because there is no assurance they will be outbid on something and get a 20 minute window to bid at 3 AM. Yet, there is no issue with sniping since anyone outbid at 9:58 will have until 10:20 to counter that bid, so no one can say they didn't have an opportunity to respond when outbid. In essence, you're keeping the auction open to allow two things - someone responding to being outbid on a lot they were just high bid on and allowing someone to move their money to other lots when they get outbid on one, while at the same time compelling everyone to get their high bids in early. OK, thoughts? Last edited by Matt; 05-04-2009 at 04:17 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Matt, unless you're on the board of directors of REA, Inc., I'm not sure your idea is anything more than fantasy. If I were Rob as long as I was only doing one auction a year I'd leave things as is. If it ain't broke, i.e., bids are at their highest, why fix it? Because a bunch of bidders complain about having to stay up late?
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Matt; 05-04-2009 at 04:24 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the challenge is to keep the auction as is but get it to end earlier than 3-4 am EST. If Rob stated that he will be shutting down the auction at approximately midnight, can he trust that bidders will believe him? Probably not -- and the risk is too great. The only real alternative is to close the lots on a one by one basis...
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff - read what Tim and I proposed (post 40). It has nothing to do with anyone trusting Rob's word on when he's going to close the auction; in fact, it removes Rob from the equation entirely.
Last edited by Matt; 05-04-2009 at 04:33 PM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We at B & L Auctions are going to implement at least one of the ideas that was overwhelmingly supported in the first 5 pages of this thread.
We will be ending our Fall Auction on a Saturday instead of during the week. As in the past we will close all lots at one time, giving bidders options on which lots to continue bidding on in the event of being priced out on other lots. As we anticipate 200-250 lots+/- , the auction should end at midnight give or take an hour. Scott & Leon Brockelman & Luckey Auctions |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From Matts post:
3) After 10 PM, anyone outbid on any lot, will get a personal 20 minute window of Extended Bidding (and normal Extended Bidding rules apply - bid on anything you have a qualifier on) from the time they are outbid. Anyone outbid on a lot from 9:40-10 PM will have a 20 minute window starting at 10 PM. 4) The auction ends (hard-ending) when the last bidder with a 20 minute window open decides not to place a high bid on any lot. Can you answer one question, if no bids for 20 minutes on a lot after 10pm, this lot closes? If this is the case, what is the difference between this and the current system used by Legendary/Mastro and H&S outside of a 30 minute window? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Conceptually - it's much closer to eBay where there is a fixed ending time - the only difference is that the effect of sniping is neutralized and only those people who are outbid have time to counter. Last edited by Matt; 05-04-2009 at 05:16 PM. |
![]() |
|
|