User Titles- yes or no?

[RichR]

Love that idea Matt

[barrysloate]

Leon- as long as I'm still living, legend is fine.

[jcmtiger]

Not needed.

Joe

[ethicsprof]

as i mentioned on the other board,my experience with this was not good on another board where folks were thought of --by some-- as not good colleagues/friends if
they didn't have a certain number of posts on a regular basis.
competition can deteriorate into many odd,and not so helpful ,things methinks.

i'm ag'in it.

best,

barry

[mybuddyinc]

I'll always be happy to be a Jr. member ................. kinda' suits me

[DaveH]

Quantity of posts does not represent quality. I can think of a few past members that prove that. I vote no.

[Leon]

The poll is closed. It was going to have to be the opposite way it is in order to do the titles as I didn't/don't want to do what a large portion of the board doesn't want. I thought it would be fun, as well as about 30% of the other respondents but that wasn't anywhere close enough (imo) to do them.....thanks to everyone who voted....

[FrankWakefield]

I vote no.

I like Matt's idea. And I like a post count. A down side with titles would be that some folks would post just to improve their title.

I've seen places where folks voted about how good a post or poster was. I'm not necessarily very keen on that, here, either.

So no to titles, but do count the post numbers, I think.

FW

[Sixtofan]

Not sure that it really adds a lot of value