![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
Tough call. '50 is neat and landmarkesque because Bowman really took large step forward in the artwork style from the year before...there's not as big a leap between the '50 and '52 though. However, for me, as much as I like the '50, the card is just too small in size (for me), the Berra pose, for instance. So, something like a full player pose makes the size of the '52 for me, plus the art on that issue ain't no slouch, to be sure. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1950 Bowman lot of 7 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-22-2008 10:05 PM |
Vintage 1950 Bowman Football Ad... | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 2 | 03-18-2008 07:32 PM |
1950 Bowman | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 11 | 02-28-2008 05:00 AM |
Let's see your 1950 Bowman cards ? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 10-01-2007 07:21 PM |
For Sale: 1948 Bowman Ray Poat, 1950 Bowman Willard Marshall... | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-22-2007 04:26 AM |