![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul S
My 2007 SCD lists #1 more valuable, $675 as compared to $600 for #250 in NM condition. However in EX and VG there is only a $15 and $20 difference, respectively, which is really negligible. I'd guess that #1 suffered the "rubber band syndrome" and that less people were buying by the time the high number #250 hit the racks, hence no chance for as much damage, if in fact they were not released all at once. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1954 Topps Ted Williams #1 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-30-2007 05:28 PM |
FS:1955 Topps #2 Ted Williams | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-22-2007 07:40 AM |
FS: 1954 Topps Ted Williams #1 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 01-13-2007 12:52 PM |
FS: 1955 Topps #2 Ted Williams | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 12-16-2006 06:41 PM |
FS:1955 Topps-Ted Williams (VG-EX) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-26-2006 02:29 PM |