![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
If real photographs don't count (which would knock out N172s as well as 1953 Bowmans), I still don't see how you can say N28s and N162s aren't cards. Not to mention N167s. The only thing they lack is stats on the back. If having stats on the back is part of the definition of being a card, then I guess T205s and T201s would probably be the first, though I may have overlooked something. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1948 Leaf Graziano card...True Story | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-15-2007 08:47 PM |
Are the 1904 WG2 Fan Craze cards considered true Baseball cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-17-2006 05:57 AM |
Gehrig's true rookie card... Need some help... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 05-05-2006 02:49 PM |
Attention Tobacco Card Collectors Too Good To Be True | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-30-2006 10:03 AM |
Ty Cobb's True Rookie Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-07-2003 10:02 AM |