 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
01-14-2009, 11:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
HOF Debate
Posted By: Dean H
My brother-in-law and I have this discussion quite often. I'm more of a believer that the HOF should be very exclusive and if a player does not make it in by the 3rd or 4th time then are they really deserving? But my brother-in-law thinks that many players are penalized by the media and many 70's players are unfairly compared to later players that might have been chemically enhance. I know that is another debate all together. It's tough and I do see arguements on both sides. Still I would like the HOF to be more exclusive. To me a player is an abvious HOF or not. Shouldn't be too much grey area although in reality there is. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T210 Rarity Debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-14-2007 09:38 PM |
| Restoration debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-19-2006 01:24 PM |
| Ty Cobb Rookie ?.....let's debate it . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-11-2006 06:15 PM |
| A Great Debate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-22-2002 11:15 PM |
| t205 debate: when were they actually printed? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-04-2002 11:39 AM |
Threaded Mode