 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-23-2008, 05:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Should the ACC be re-written?
Posted By: Dave Hornish
I always thought 1980 was a logical cutoff due to the fact it's both the last year of the 70's (I speak the truth) and the final year before Fleer and Donruss changed everything; it's truly the end of an era. While a scheme is needed post 1980 (which I could care less about at this point), to me it would look far different than the ACC and its updates going back from that date. There's just so many parallel issues now, you almost need a whole new nomenclature. And the amount of issues post '80 is daunting, as pointed out earlier. 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Baseball postcards with interesting written content wanted | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-09-2007 02:29 PM |
| Side written pre-war bat | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 05-11-2007 08:36 AM |
| ACC designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 09-27-2006 06:50 PM |
| If you don't have it, buy an ACC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-25-2005 08:22 AM |
| Red Hindu T206 w/7C written on back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-25-2004 06:25 PM |
Hybrid Mode
