 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-25-2008, 02:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Consistent grading
Posted By: David Poses
i wasn't necessarily suggesting that i was a victim of inconsistent grading- i have read nothing but great things about sgc- i'm just saying that it may be helpful in the grading process, to the graders, to have a reference point in front of them. a crease is a crease, but how much red ink needs to be scraped from the border of an otherwise sharp t210 to warrant a particular grade, etc. is a faint stamp of someone's name on the back of an otherwise ok card enough to call it "back damage" and grade a PSA 1? etc... 
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| grading help | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 02-28-2009 04:27 PM |
| Grading: What do you do | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 12-09-2006 12:12 PM |
| Goodwin Auction T216 Honus Wagner - consistent grading??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2006 10:58 AM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 08:42 AM |
| PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 07:14 AM |
Hybrid Mode
