 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19
09-14-2008, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Here we go again with the fake Wag
Posted By: leon
If I remember correctly the back might be a period back glued onto the front(reprint)....so the paper guys could have tested the back and deemed the back to be period paper... Not much else to say concerning the whole silly episode, otherwise, which hasn't already been said. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looks fake to me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-26-2008 08:34 AM |
| Look fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-17-2005 07:37 PM |
| What a deal! Fake Ramly and fake signature to boot! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-13-2005 11:16 AM |
| Fake ???? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-09-2002 07:39 PM |
| is this a fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-25-2002 01:05 PM |
Threaded Mode